Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
May 5-8, 2024
Amplify Your Impact There’s no limit to what you can achieve when you join the global risk managem …
May 13-15, 2024
Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …
May 13-14, 2024
The Board of Managers is excited to announce that the CSIA 2024 Annual Meeting and Educational Con …
2 Comments
Log in to post a comment
Stuart Baron Feb 23, 2018 a 7:02 pm PST
It would appear to be a valid denial by the court. You will notice that they did not say that the carrier had to pay for the surgery (LC4605). What they did say is that since it was successful and she recovered, providing her with TD and potential PD makes sense and is in line with the statute....
Anne Bazel Feb 23, 2018 a 9:02 pm PST
They should've paid for the surgery. Since it was successful, obviously it was medically necessary.
Stuart Green Feb 26, 2018 a 4:02 pm PST
What if the surgery made her worse, or at least no better?
Cliff Bernstein Feb 24, 2018 a 8:02 am PST
The UR doctor should state whether or not they reviewed the patients records