Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
May 5-8, 2024
Amplify Your Impact There’s no limit to what you can achieve when you join the global risk managem …
May 13-15, 2024
Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …
May 13-14, 2024
The Board of Managers is excited to announce that the CSIA 2024 Annual Meeting and Educational Con …
One Comment
Log in to post a comment
Ted Penny Nov 15, 2017 a 3:11 pm PST
To the extent that the facts bear out this story, the most noteworthy observation to be made is the inability of the QME to be able to distinguish between a 100% impairment and an 18% impairment. Is this a failure in the exam process, does it reflect a doctor’s willingness to search for an impairment rating that matches the complaints of the injured worker or is it an artifact of the Guides? More should be done to look at this and similar cases to determine how to improve the method of impairment assessment.