Switch back to WCC classic look
Search Guide
Today is Wednesday, April 23, 2014 -
Case Law Library - CA
Case Law | Statutes/Codes | Regulations | WIKI | Glossary | CA Flowchart
WCAB Panel Opinions | Sullivan on Comp

Case Law Search: Note - WorkCompCentral does not offer Writ Denied CCC reports because they are copyrighted to Lexis Nexis. However, we are the exclusive publisher of full text WCAB Panel Opinions!


Quick find:: a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z

Sort By :

Case Name: Insur. Co. of N. America v. T.L.C. Lines Date: 10/16/1996
Note: Where the tortfeasor settles with an insured in good faith, the insurer's right to recovery from the tortfeasor is barred but the insurer may be able to recover from its insured.
Citation: 50 Cal.App.4th 90, 61 CCC 1166
WCC Citation: WCC 23901996 CA
Case Name: Industrial Indemnity Co. v. WCAB Date: 12/29/1997
Note: CIGA not liable for workers' comp. when two other insurers were also liable for benefits.
Citation: 60 Cal.App.4th 548, 62 CCC 1661
WCC Citation: WCC 25411997 CA
Case Name: In re Interstate Indem. Co., Date: 12/31/1969
Note: Appointed reinsurers have preference to assets of insolvent insurer over general creditors.
Citation: 219 Cal.App.2d 809, 28 CCC 288
WCC Citation: WCC 25671963 CA
Case Name: In re Alleged Contempt of Albert H. Corliss Date: 01/31/1991
Note: Atty. who requests/accepts fee based on contingency arrgt. w/ applicant w/o Bd. approval is subject to contempt.
Citation: 56 CCC 132
WCC Citation: WCC 27182001 CA
Case Name: Ito v. WCAB (Fry's Food Stores) Date: 10/29/1993
Note: When doubt exists as to whether injuries are cumulative or separate, file separate applications for each incident.
Citation: 58 CCC 744
WCC Citation: WCC 27581993 CA
Case Name: In re Alleged Contempt of Irwin Lee, Esq. Date: 10/30/1987
Note: Contempt sanction for filing Declaration of Readiness for improper purpose.
Citation: 52 CCC 492
WCC Citation: WCC 27601987 CA
Case Name: In Re Alleged Contempt of Maxim N. Bach, Esq. Date: 11/10/1988
Note: Contempt sanction for attorney interfering with WCAB subpoena on release of applicant's medical records.
Citation: 53 CCC 474
WCC Citation: WCC 27891988 CA
Case Name: In Re Alleged Contempt of, Respondent Date: 01/07/1983
Note: Attorney falsely represented that case was reassigned to approve a C&R. .
Citation: 48 CCC 4
WCC Citation: WCC 27991983 CA
Case Name: Islas vs. D & G Manufacturing Co., Inc. Date: 07/09/2004
Note: Definition of 'power press' is one of fact for trier of fact.
Citation: 120 Cal.App.4th 571
WCC Citation: WCC 29972004 CA
Case Name: In re Lockheed Litigation Cases Date: 01/31/2005
Note: A court cannot exclude an epidemiological study from consideration solely because the study shows a relative risk of less than 2.0.
Citation: 126 Cal.App.4th 271
WCC Citation: WCC 30772005 CA
Case Name: In the Matter of John H. Hoffman, Jr. Date: 05/17/2006
Note: Rule 10779 and the State Bar Act preclude any non-reinstated former attorney who has been disbarred or suspended by the Supreme Court from appearing as a representative of any party before the WCAB.
Citation: 70 CCC 609
WCC Citation: WCC 31602006 CA
Case Name: Infinet Marketing Services, Inc. v. American Motorist Insurance Company Date: 04/06/2007
Note: The insurance broker is not a third party beneficiary of the insurance contract.
Citation: 150 Cal. App. 4th 168
WCC Citation: WCC 32182007 CA
Case Name: In re Matter of Pellicer Date: 07/09/2008
Note: A 'defrocked' attorney cannot be permitted to appear in workers' compensation proceedings.
Citation: MISC. 251
WCC Citation: WCC 33942008 CA
Case Name: Industrial Indemnity Co. v. WCAB Date: 03/13/1985
Note: The Board's statutory interpretation allowing benefits during the qualified injured worker (QIW) evaluation period, provided the employee in good faith presents prima facie evidence justifying a request for rehabilitation, clearly forecloses false claims. Such interpretation is consistent with, and not in conflict with, the statute, and is reasonably necessary to effect the statutory purposes.
Citation: B003862
WCC Citation: WCC 34351985 CA
Case Name: Interstate Fire and Casualty Ins. Co. v Cleveland Wrecking Co. Date: 02/22/2010
Note: It is prudent to permit subrogation, so that a party with an alleged contractual indemnification obligation will be encouraged to step up in the underlying case and either fulfill the obligation (and implicitly help settle the case) or resolve any dispute over the application of the indemnification obligation.
Citation: A124920
WCC Citation: WCC 36002010 CA
Case Name: Integrated Healthcare Holdings inc. v. Weiss (G042016) Date: 09/13/2010
Note: An attorney who had settled a lawsuit against his former employer breached the parties' settlement agreement by continuing to pursue a Labor Code 132a claim against the employer at the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the 4th District Court of Appeal concluded.
Citation: G042016
WCC Citation: WCC 36652010 CA
Case Name: Integrated Healthcare Holdings inc. v. Weiss (G041905) Date: 09/13/2010
Note: An attorney who had settled a lawsuit against his former employer breached the parties' settlement agreement by continuing to pursue a Labor Code 132a claim against the employer at the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the 4th District Court of Appeal concluded.
Citation: G041905
WCC Citation: WCC 36662010 CA
Case Name: Iverson v. California Village Homeowners Assoc. Date: 03/23/2011
Note: An independent contractor could not rely on Cal-OSHA regulations to establish negligence per se in a premises liability suit, the California 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled.
Citation: B220863
WCC Citation: WCC 37352011 CA
Case Name: Irvine Eurocars v. WCAB (Shelly) Date: 02/11/2011
Note: The state Supreme Court will not review a split panel decision featuring a controversial dispute about whether an auto dealership was a nanny's employer.
Citation: ADJ4715696
WCC Citation: WCC 37872011 CA
Case Name: Integrated Investigations Inc. v. O'Donnell Date: 10/18/2011
Note: A California appellate court on Tuesday threw out a private investigation firm's lawsuit against a defense attorney who had advised agencies affiliated with Los Angeles County to avoid using the firm because it had failed to report to the county that one of its investigators had been involved in a high-speed chase with a workers' compensation applicant.
Citation: B231035
WCC Citation: WCC 38132011 CA
Select number of records per page

Upcoming Events
Apr 30, 2014
Insurance Council of Texas: Sp...
Adjusters, Case managers and Workers' Compensation Attorneys: this seminar was developed with you ...
May 08, 2014
NCCI's Annual Issues Symposium...
When workers compensation is your focus, AIS is the event to keep in your sights. AIS provides an ...
May 10, 2014
Rules and Revelations: How to ...
Permanent regulations for Utilization Review (UR) and Independent Medical Review (IMR) became effe...
May 14, 2014
PIWC Mini Conference...
Location: 4584 W Jacquelyn Ave # 204, Fresno · (559) 277-3663 Cost: ...
More