Register for a free trial!
Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Tuesday, April 16, 2024 -
Case Law Library - CA

Note: WorkCompCentral does not offer Writ Denied CCC reports because they are copyrighted to Lexis Nexis. However, we are the exclusive publisher of full text WCAB Panel Opinions!

Quick find: a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z
  • Case name:
    O'Donnell v. Allen
    Date:
    06/21/2010
    Note:
    [Unpublished] Language of the retainer agreement is not reasonably susceptible to the interpretation urged by defendant and adopted by the trial court.
    Citation:
    B213420
    WCC citation:
    WCC 36402010 CA
  • Case name:
    Obayashi v. PMN Design Electric
    Date:
    01/16/2008
    Note:
    [Unpublished] Appellant cannot establish that it has incurred or will incur damages, and based on the exclusivity of California's Worker Compensation Scheme, is prohibited from seeking equitable indemnity.
    Citation:
    A114597
    WCC citation:
    WCC 33012008 CA
  • Case name:
    Ogdon v. WCAB
    Date:
    04/15/1974
    Note:
    No lien against comp. benefits allowed for welfare aid.
    Citation:
    11 Cal.3d 192
    WCC citation:
    WCC 24971974 CA
  • Case name:
    Ogilvie v. City and County of San Francisco (II)
    Date:
    09/03/2009
    Note:
    [En Banc] The language of Labor Code section 4660(c) unambiguously means that a permanent disability rating established by the Schedule is rebuttable.
    Citation:
    ADJ1177048
    WCC citation:
    WCC 35612009 CA
  • Case name:
    Ogilvie vs. City and County of San Francisco
    Date:
    02/03/2009
    Note:
    (1) the DFEC portion of the 2005 Schedule is rebuttable; (2) the DFEC portion of the 2005 Schedule ordinarily is not rebutted by establishing the percentage to which an injured employee's future earning capacity has been diminished; (3) the DFEC portion of the 2005 Schedule is not rebutted by taking two-thirds of the injured employee's estimated diminished future earnings, and then comparing the resulting sum to the permanent disability money chart to approximate a corresponding permanent disability rating; and (4) the DFEC portion of the 2005 Schedule may be rebutted in a manner consistent with Labor Code section 4660.
    Citation:
    ADJ1177048 (SFO 0487779)
    WCC citation:
    WCC 34882009 CA
  • Case name:
    Oliva v. Heath
    Date:
    06/09/1995
    Note:
    Co-workers not liable for injury caused by horseplay within scope of employment.
    Citation:
    35 Cal.App.4th 926
    WCC citation:
    WCC 24161995 CA
  • Case name:
    One Hour Cleaners, etc. v. WCAB
    Date:
    05/04/1998
    Note:
    Employer's rehab. expenditures not subject to 139.5 cap when employer did not send applicant required prior notice of rights to rehab.
    Citation:
    63 CCC 774
    WCC citation:
    WCC 27941998 CA
  • Case name:
    Operating Engineers v. Johnson
    Date:
    07/03/2003
    Note:
    Invasion of privacy not barred by exclusive remedy of work comp.
    Citation:
    110 Cal.App.4th 180
    WCC citation:
    WCC 29442003 CA
  • Case name:
    Ortega v. Rady Children's Hospital
    Date:
    04/18/2011
    Note:
    An employer was entitled to summary judgment against a housekeeper's Fair Employment and Housing Act claims because it showed that no reasonable accommodation existed that would have allowed her to continue performing her job.
    Citation:
    D056282
    WCC citation:
    WCC 37462011 CA
  • Case name:
    Ortega v. WCAB
    Date:
    05/02/1989
    Note:
    Where applicant's assertions are not based in the record, Board has duty to develop the record.
    Citation:
    54 CCC 149
    WCC citation:
    WCC 27231989 CA
  • Case name:
    Osbun v. WCAB
    Date:
    05/17/1979
    Note:
    Where deposition testimony wasn't before WCAB it would not be considered by reviewing court.
    Citation:
    93 Cal.App.3d 163
    WCC citation:
    WCC 27101979 CA
  • Case name:
    Otis vs. City of Los Angeles, etc. et. al.
    Date:
    10/02/1980
    Note:
    Appropriate procedure to follow when contesting medical-legal lien.
    Citation:
    45 CCC 1132 (En Banc)
    WCC citation:
    WCC 28711980 CA
  • Case name:
    Ott v. WCAB
    Date:
    05/06/1981
    Note:
    Employer bears burden of proving voluntary nature of wage payments for credit against indemnity.
    Citation:
    118 Cal.App.3d 912
    WCC citation:
    WCC 3381981 CA

Advertisements

Advertise with us

Now Trending

Jobs

Upcoming Events

  • May 5-8, 2024

    Risk World

    Amplify Your Impact There’s no limit to what you can achieve when you join the global risk managem …

  • May 13-15, 2024

    NCCI's Annual Insights Symposi

    Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …

  • May 13-14, 2024

    CSIA Announces the 2024 Annual

    The Board of Managers is excited to announce that the CSIA 2024 Annual Meeting and Educational Con …

Workers' Compensation Events

more

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333