Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Thursday, March 28, 2024 -
Case Law Library - CA

Note: WorkCompCentral does not offer Writ Denied CCC reports because they are copyrighted to Lexis Nexis. However, we are the exclusive publisher of full text WCAB Panel Opinions!

Quick find: a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z
  • Case name:
    M.F. v. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management
    Date:
    10/26/2017
    Note:
    A California appellate court ruled that a hotel worker could proceed with a claim against her employer under the Fair Employment and Housing Act for failing to protect her from sexual assault by a trespasser who was known to be on the property and harassing other members of the staff.
    Citation:
    D070150
    WCC citation:
    Super. Ct. No. 37-2014-00039787- CU-PO-CTL
  • Case name:
    M/A Com-Phi v. WCAB
    Date:
    07/29/1998
    Note:
    WCAB had duty to develop record and show surveillance film to defense.
    Citation:
    65 Cal.App.4th 1020, 63 CCC 821
    WCC citation:
    WCC 25561998 CA
  • Case name:
    Mackey vs. Dept. of Corrections
    Date:
    01/27/2003
    Note:
    Exclusive remedy of employee not the direct victim of sexual harassment or discrimination is work comp.
    Citation:
    105 Cal.App.4th 945, 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 57
    WCC citation:
    WCC 29102003 CA
  • Case name:
    Madden v. Summit View, Inc.
    Date:
    08/11/2008
    Note:
    Plaintiff did not know how high he was off the ground when he fell and no one else witnessed the accident. Plaintiff is therefore unable to establish that a safety railing would have been required by section 1621 at the location where he fell. Since he cannot prove a causal relationship between his injuries and Defendant's asserted omission to perform a nondelegable duty, Plaintiff cannot avoid summary judgment.
    Citation:
    A117128
    WCC citation:
    WCC 34112008 CA
  • Case name:
    Madin v. Industrial Accident Commission
    Date:
    02/03/1956
    Note:
    Prescribed minimum payments do not violate the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution.
    Citation:
    46 Cal.2d 90
    WCC citation:
    WCC 33581956 CA
  • Case name:
    Malais v. Los Angeles City Fire Department
    Date:
    03/29/2007
    Note:
    The only reason Malais was dissatisfied with special as opposed to platoon duty was that he preferred the work, schedule, and camaraderie of platoon duty to that of special duty, not that he suffered any adverse employment consequences from being limited to special duty.
    Citation:
    150 Cal. App. 4th 350
    WCC citation:
    WCC 32192007 CA
  • Case name:
    Maldonado v. Medivators
    Date:
    06/27/2017
    Note:
    Citation:
    G052489
    WCC citation:
    Super. Ct. No. 30-2013-00682880
  • Case name:
    Manriquez v. Adams
    Date:
    04/30/2003
    Note:
    Error to calculate subro attorney fees based on full value of settlement fund.
    Citation:
    108 Cal.App.4th 340
    WCC citation:
    WCC 29332003 CA
  • Case name:
    Mantel v. WCAB
    Date:
    03/06/1974
    Note:
    Procedural deficiencies in Order of Recon. do not render it invalid; party benefiting from order may not complain of deficiencies on appeal.
    Citation:
    37 Cal.App.3d 739, 39 CCC 223
    WCC citation:
    WCC 26981974 CA
  • Case name:
    Manzano vs. Flavurence Corp., etc., et. al.
    Date:
    07/10/2002
    Note:
    CIGA should not be dismissed until a determination is made on issues which could result in CIGA liability.
    Citation:
    67 CCC 914 (Panel)
    WCC citation:
    WCC 28702002 CA
  • Case name:
    Maples v. WCAB
    Date:
    11/06/1980
    Note:
    Employer/insurer cannot claim credit for overpayment of TD because of unreasonable delay in filing med. report and not filing petition to terminate TD after terminating benefits.
    Citation:
    111 Cal.App.3d 827, 45 CCC 1106
    WCC citation:
    WCC 24881980 CA
  • Case name:
    Maraj v. Ralphs Grocery Company
    Date:
    05/25/2011
    Note:
    An exception to the exclusive remedy rule did not apply to an injured grocery store employee's civil suit because she could not prove that Ralphs Grocery Co. concealed her injury, the 2nd District Court of Appeal concluded.
    Citation:
    B223410
    WCC citation:
    WCC 37672011 CA
  • Case name:
    Maranian v. WCAB
    Date:
    06/26/2000
    Note:
    90-day limitation runs from date of receipt of Claim Form; Order on Recon final re appellate review.
    Citation:
    81 Cal.App.4th 1068, 65 CCC 650
    WCC citation:
    WCC 24912000 CA
  • Case name:
    Margaret A. Seltzer v. William Gwire
    Date:
    04/20/2012
    Note:
    An attorney, represented in a civil action by a former employee of his firm, was entitled to recover his legal fees as the prevailing party in the underlying action.
    Citation:
    A128902
    WCC citation:
    WCC 38872012 CA
  • Case name:
    Marin Schools Insurance Authority v. Schools Excess Liability Fund
    Date:
    07/11/2017
    Note:
    Citation:
    A145365
    WCC citation:
    Napa County Super. Ct. No. 26-62558
  • Case name:
    Marine v. College of Sequoias
    Date:
    02/01/2012
    Note:
    A college employee fired after getting into a fight with a co-worker's sister and being tried for assault with a deadly weapon could not challenge her termination, but she could pursue her claims of retaliation and discrimination based on her request for accommodation of her disabilities.
    Citation:
    F061765
    WCC citation:
    WCC 38532012 CA
  • Case name:
    Marinwood Community Services v. WCAB (Ramos)
    Date:
    03/29/2017
    Note:
    Citation:
    A147582
    WCC citation:
    WCAB No. ADJ8778127
  • Case name:
    Market Basket v. WCAB
    Date:
    10/31/1978
    Note:
    Physician's report defective where no reference to preexisting psychiatric condition.
    Citation:
    86 Cal.App.3d 137, 43 CCC 1186
    WCC citation:
    WCC 28081978 CA
  • Case name:
    Marquez v. Novellus Systems
    Date:
    02/23/2009
    Note:
    A property owner is not liable to a dead tree trimmer's estate because it did not owe him a duty to protect him from a wood chipper.
    Citation:
    H033103
    WCC citation:
    WCC 34982009 CA
  • Case name:
    Marquez v. WCAB
    Date:
    07/28/1995
    Note:
    Lien not allowed for overpaid disability benefits against subsequent employer comp. payments.
    Citation:
    60 CCC 711
    WCC citation:
    WCC 25061995 CA

Advertisements

Upcoming Events

  • May 13-15, 2024

    NCCI's Annual Insights Symposi

    Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …

  • Jul 29 – Aug 2, 2024

    76th Annual SAWCA Convention

    SAVE THE DATE! 76th Annual SAWCA Convention July 29 – August 2, 2024 Hotel Effie Sandestin 1 Grand …

  • Aug 14-17, 2024

    CSIMS 2024 Annual Dual Track C

    California Society of Industrial Medicine and Surgery (CSIMS) is combining its two conferences, PI …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333