Register for a free trial!
Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Friday, April 19, 2024 -
Case Law Library - CA

Note: WorkCompCentral does not offer Writ Denied CCC reports because they are copyrighted to Lexis Nexis. However, we are the exclusive publisher of full text WCAB Panel Opinions!

Quick find: a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z
  • Case name:
    Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. v. Gaddy
    Date:
    02/07/2008
    Note:
    A noncompetitive covenant regarding the sale of a company may only address the geographic location in which the company sold does business. However, the area where a business is 'carried on' is not limited to the locations of its buildings, plants and warehouses, nor the area in which it actually made sales. Here, a company that primarily does business in 4 counties is able to show that they are a California service and may enforce a covenant not to compete in any and all 58 counties in California.
    Citation:
    C055192
    WCC citation:
    WCC 33142008 CA
  • Case name:
    Allied Interstate, Inc. v. GTS Home Health Services, Inc.
    Date:
    02/14/2013
    Note:
    A home health care provider which admitted having received a copy of the summons and complaint filed by the assignee of a State Compensation Insurance Fund debt was not entitled to have the default judgment against it vacated on the basis of improper service.
    Citation:
    B237823
    WCC citation:
    WCC 39872013 CA
  • Case name:
    Allied Interstate, Inc. v. Sessions Payroll Management, Inc.
    Date:
    02/16/2012
    Note:
    State Compensation Insurance Fund properly applied a 121% experience modifier to a Burbank payroll company that serves the movie industry.
    Citation:
    B226134
    WCC citation:
    WCC 38592012 CA
  • Case name:
    Allied Waste Industries, et al. v. WCAB (Rojas)
    Date:
    12/06/2010
    Note:
    A claimant's cost-of-living adjustments should not begin until the January 1 following his date of injury.
    Citation:
    C064914
    WCC citation:
    WCC 36872010 CA
  • Case name:
    Allison v. WCAB
    Date:
    05/27/1999
    Note:
    WCJ's have authority to hear and rule on discovery disputes.
    Citation:
    72 Cal.App.4th 654, 64 CCC 624
    WCC citation:
    WCC 26011999 CA
  • Case name:
    Almaraz v. Environmental Recovery Services (II)
    Date:
    09/03/2009
    Note:
    [En Banc] The language of Labor Code section 4660(c) unambiguously means that a permanent disability rating established by the Schedule is rebuttable.
    Citation:
    ADJ1078163
    WCC citation:
    WCC 35632009 CA
  • Case name:
    Almaraz vs. Environmental Recovery Services (SCIF); Guzman vs. Milpitas Unified School Dist (Keenan)
    Date:
    02/03/2009
    Note:
    (1) the AMA Guides portion of the 2005 Schedule is rebuttable; (2) the AMA Guides portion of the 2005 Schedule is rebutted by showing that an impairment rating based on the AMA Guides would result in a permanent disability award that would be inequitable, disproportionate, and not a fair and accurate measure of the employees permanent disability; and (3) when an impairment rating based on the AMA Guides has been rebutted, the WCAB may make an impairment determination that considers medical opinions that are not based or are only partially based on the AMA Guides.
    Citation:
    ADJ1078163 (BAK 0145426); ADJ3341185 (SJO 0254688)
    WCC citation:
    WCC 34892009 CA
  • Case name:
    Alonzo v. Brennan
    Date:
    08/24/2011
    Note:
    A hospital employee is entitled to $38,169 in attorney fees because she prevailed in a third-party suit that also helped her employer.
    Citation:
    B222327
    WCC citation:
    WCC 37922011 CA
  • Case name:
    Alvarez v. Seaside Transportation Services LLC
    Date:
    07/20/2017
    Note:
    Citation:
    B275980
    WCC citation:
    Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC538128
  • Case name:
    Alvarez v. WCAB
    Date:
    05/14/2010
    Note:
    [Superceded] Section 4062.3 expressly prohibits ex parte communications with a panel qualified medical evaluator, with the only exception being for communications by the employee or deceased employee's dependent in connection with an examination, and in the event of unauthorized ex parte communication permits the aggrieved party to obtain a new evaluation from another panel qualified medical evaluator.
    Citation:
    B218847
    WCC citation:
    WCC 36212010 CA

Advertisements

Advertise with us

Now Trending

Jobs

Upcoming Events

  • May 5-8, 2024

    Risk World

    Amplify Your Impact There’s no limit to what you can achieve when you join the global risk managem …

  • May 13-15, 2024

    NCCI's Annual Insights Symposi

    Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …

  • May 13-14, 2024

    CSIA Announces the 2024 Annual

    The Board of Managers is excited to announce that the CSIA 2024 Annual Meeting and Educational Con …

Workers' Compensation Events

more

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333