Register for a free trial!
Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Wednesday, April 17, 2024 -
Case Law Library - CA

Note: WorkCompCentral does not offer Writ Denied CCC reports because they are copyrighted to Lexis Nexis. However, we are the exclusive publisher of full text WCAB Panel Opinions!

Quick find: a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z
  • Case name:
    Lovett v. Carrasco
    Date:
    04/15/1998
    Note:
    The common fund doctrine cannot be applied to apportion a plaintiff's attorney fees among contractual medical lienholders.
    Citation:
    63 Cal.App.4th 48
    WCC citation:
    WCC 35921998 CA
  • Case name:
    Luchini v. WCAB
    Date:
    04/30/1970
    Note:
    Prophylactic restrictions are valid for rating permanent disability.
    Citation:
    7 Cal.App.3d 141, 35 CCC 205
    WCC citation:
    WCC 25211970 CA
  • Case name:
    Lui v. City and County of San Francisco
    Date:
    12/11/2012
    Note:
    The city and county of San Francisco's inability to accommodate a disabled police officer in an administrative position did not violate the Fair Employment and Housing Act.
    Citation:
    A131882
    WCC citation:
    WCC 39542012 CA
  • Case name:
    Lujan vs. Minagar
    Date:
    12/09/2004
    Note:
    Retaliatory discharge action lies for who MIGHT report a safety violation.
    Citation:
    124 Cal. App. 4th 1040
    WCC citation:
    WCC 30682004 CA
  • Case name:
    Lujan vs. WCAB, Vanier Graphics
    Date:
    12/03/1985
    Note:
    Full time post injury earnings must be considered for a fair determination of earning capacity.
    Citation:
    175 CA3rd 212
    WCC citation:
    WCC 29901985 CA
  • Case name:
    Luna v. WCAB
    Date:
    02/29/1988
    Note:
    Going and coming: requirements to find special mission an exception to rule.
    Citation:
    199 C.A.3d 77
    WCC citation:
    WCC 28521988 CA
  • Case name:
    Lund v. San Joaquin Valley Railroad
    Date:
    07/03/2003
    Note:
    Under a Federal Employers Liability Act case, the jury should not be told that plaintiff is not entitled to work comp unless probative value outweighs prejudicial effect.
    Citation:
    31 Cal.4th 1, 71 P.3d 770
    WCC citation:
    WCC 29452003 CA
  • Case name:
    Luque v. Herrera
    Date:
    06/12/2000
    Note:
    Employee's attorney entitled to fees when employer participated in litigation and reimbursement claim exceeded the settlement.
    Citation:
    81 Cal.App.4th 558, 65 CCC 812
    WCC citation:
    WCC 23912000 CA
  • Case name:
    Ly v. County of Fresno
    Date:
    09/15/2017
    Note:
    The 5th District Court of Appeal last week ordered publication of its prior determination that a group of correctional officers could not pursue a discrimination action against their employer, since they had already litigated their claims in pursuit of workers’ compensation benefits.
    Citation:
    F072351
    WCC citation:
    Super. Ct. No. 09CECG02743
  • Case name:
    Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Productions
    Date:
    04/20/2006
    Note:
    Sexual jokes and vulgar language not directed at plaintiff did not constitute severe or pervasive harassment under FEHA.
    Citation:
    38 Cal. 4th 264
    WCC citation:
    WCC 31542006 CA

Advertisements

Advertise with us

Now Trending

Jobs

Upcoming Events

  • May 5-8, 2024

    Risk World

    Amplify Your Impact There’s no limit to what you can achieve when you join the global risk managem …

  • May 13-15, 2024

    NCCI's Annual Insights Symposi

    Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …

  • May 13-14, 2024

    CSIA Announces the 2024 Annual

    The Board of Managers is excited to announce that the CSIA 2024 Annual Meeting and Educational Con …

Workers' Compensation Events

more

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333