Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Thursday, March 28, 2024 -

Industry Insights

Grinberg: Are We Loving the Med-Legal Fee Schedule Yet?

  • State: California
  • -  0 shares

Let’s take a look at the current med-legal fee schedule. In a supreme bit of irony, the fee schedule went into effect on April Fools’ Day in 2021. Now that we’ve had it for over a year, what results can we see from this new system?

Gregory Grinberg

Gregory Grinberg

Did the extra money attract the top physicians to write excellent reports and minimize the need for more med-legal services? Are cases now resolved more expeditiously with an accurate level of benefits and lower costs for employers?

Come on, people, it’s been over a year! Certainly, there are now lots more qualified medical evaluators so that the wait times are lower and the reporting is more consistent, right?

Well, the California Workers' Compensation Institute has prepared a study reflecting that compared to 2019, there’s been more than a 50% increase in payments for face-to-face exams and almost 40% for supplemental reports. Three dollars per page in review as per the fee schedule has also drastically increased the cost of an initial exam by almost $2,000. 

According to the CWCI, the fee schedule resulted in a 3% increase of QMEs in the active evaluator pool as compared to 2022, and 1% less than 2019! In other words, the new fee schedule has enriched existing QMEs with huge fees but has not attracted more QMEs to the industry. 

The new regulations have also failed to provide recourse for employers when reports are not substantial medical evidence or to recoup costs. There is practically no disincentive to produce intentionally vague or incoherent reports to entice parties to depose the doctor or seek a supplemental report, generating more fees for the doctor and more costs for the defense. We all recognize those doctors on our panels that will force at least three evaluations, four depositions and seven supplemental reports before there’s enough in the record that you can get a ruling other than “develop the record.”

Of course, this is great for the applicant bar: The more expensive the claims process is due to med-legal fees, the more inflated the “nuisance” value of each claim is.

Gregory Grinberg is managing partner of Gale, Sutow & Associates’ S.F. Bay South office and a certified specialist in workers’ compensation law. This post is reprinted with permission from Grinberg’s WCDefenseCA blog.

No Comments

Log in to post a comment

Close


Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.

Advertisements

Upcoming Events

  • May 13-15, 2024

    NCCI's Annual Insights Symposi

    Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …

  • Jul 29 – Aug 2, 2024

    76th Annual SAWCA Convention

    SAVE THE DATE! 76th Annual SAWCA Convention July 29 – August 2, 2024 Hotel Effie Sandestin 1 Grand …

  • Aug 14-17, 2024

    CSIMS 2024 Annual Dual Track C

    California Society of Industrial Medicine and Surgery (CSIMS) is combining its two conferences, PI …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333