- Home
- Contact
- About Us
- Forgot Password
- Memberships
- Register
- Submit Press
- Privacy Policy
- TOS
- Disclaimers
- Marketing & Branding
- Corporate Sales
- Education
- RSS
© 2026 WorkCompCentral Workers Compensation Information
Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Jun 12, 2026
Get ready to “Be the Ball!” at AWCP’s 27th Annual Caddyshack Classic. Spend the day at Lincoln Hil …
Jun 23, 2026
Rafael Gonzalez, Esq. and John V. Cattie, Jr., will provide practical, real-world guidance to help …
Jul 7-9, 2026
Register Now! The CCWC Annual Conference: Legislative & Educational Forum creates opportunities f …
One Comment
Log in to post a comment
Dr May 28, 2022 a 11:55 am PDT
Does Razo agree that Utilization Review physicians should be licensed to practice medicine in California, the same as treating physicians, or does he prefer to keep them exempt? I refer to "How to Practice Medicine without a license, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 8/29/08.
Does Razo agree that Duty of Care as a professional ethic should be as equally applied to Utilization Review physicians as it is to treating physicians? I refer to "Weinmann: UR physicians do not owe injured workers 'Duty of Care, '" WORKCOMPCENTRAL, 18 Sept 2018.
-- Robert L. Weinmann, MD, Pres, California Neurology Society, chair, Legislation Cmte, formerly president, L 206, AFSCME (UAPD)