07/01/2021
tolled.
Finally we admonish defense counsel Mark Pike with the Law Offices of Tracey Lazarus
for using offensive inappropriate and disrespectful language in the Petition for Reconsideration.
We specifically object to the following language It is apparent that the WCJ in her decision took
the
Category: Panel
06/08/2021
.
Procedural history Sanders initiated an action in the Pike Circuit Court to determine the workers' compensation benefits Means was entitled to recover and he filed discovery requests for information about the decision to implement the new method of processing aluminum dross.
In October 2016 the trial
Category: News
01/01/2021
should be found to apply.
Applicants Answer to Petition for
Reconsideration November 18 2020 p. 324-25. It is acknowledged that applicant may not be
awarded temporary disability in excess of the statutory maximum number of weeks. See County
of San Diego v. Workers Comp. Appeals Bd. Pike
Category: Panel
12/18/2020
; WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and KYLE PIKE Respondents.
4. D072648
5. WCAB No. ADJ7811907
6. Petition for writ of review from an order of the
Category: Cases
12/18/2020
constitutional concerns as a disproportionate burden on interstate commerce under Pike v. Bruce Church Inc. 397 U.S. 137 1970.
I. Factual Background
The relevant facts are undisputed.fn2
Prescriber-identifying data is used for many purposes but this case concerns restrictions on
Category: Cases
12/18/2020
the foregoing reasons the judgment of the Pike Circuit Court is reversed and this case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ALL CONCUR.
Footnotes
1. Senior Judge Daniel T. Guidugli was an associate panel member
Category: Cases
12/18/2020
determining that the provisions of KRS 342.1402 pertaining to occupations which are exclusively seasonal are irrelevant to a determination of Ballard's average weekly wage. The question of whether particular work is seasonal depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Pike County Bd. of Educ. v
Category: Cases
12/18/2020
Potter v. Eli Lilly and Co. 926 S. W.2d 449 455 Ky. 1996.
fn15 Akers v. Pike County Board ofEducation 171 S. W.3d 740 743 Ky. 2005.
fn16 Patrick v. Christopher East Health Care 142 S.W.3d 149 Ky. 2004.
fn17 Eadie v. Complete Co. Inc. 142 S.W.3d 288 291 Tenn. 2004.
Category: Cases
12/18/2020
U Copley v. Pike Electric No. 2008-CA-001040-WC Ky.App. 04172009
THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
No. 2008-CA-001040-WC
April 17 2009
RANDY COPLEY APPELLANT
v.
PIKE ELECTRIC; HONORABLE RICHARD JOINER ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE; AND
Category: Cases
12/18/2020
THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
No. 2007-CA-001610-MR
October 17 2008
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANT
v.
BLACKSTONE MINING COMPANY INC. APPELLEE
APPEAL FROM PIKE CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE EDDY COLEMAN JUDGE ACTION No. 97-CI-00684
Category: Cases