03/01/2021
EmployerCarriers Motion to Compel Claimants Attendance
at Independent Medical Examination filed February 9 2021 DN 304.
Claimants Proffered Exhibit
1. Correspondence from Broadspire to Dr. Edgar Ramirez-Pagan dated November 25
2020 DN 304 Exhibit A.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions
Category: Panel
03/01/2021
of
negligence between the applicant and the fellow County of Orange employees...
...
3
Defendant contend that the general reasonably prudent person standard of care for tort liability applies to the facts
of this case. See Ramirez v. Plough Inc. 1993 6 Cal.4th 539 546-547.
4
Once the
Category: Panel
03/01/2021
release was obtained for
claimants PCP Dr. Ramirez as well as Osceola Neurology Specialists. Thus quite
clearly the Concentra physician who first saw the claimant recognized the need to
obtain those records as part of the evaluation of claimants condition. The record does
not indicate whether
Category: Panel
03/01/2021
release was obtained for
claimants PCP Dr. Ramirez as well as Osceola Neurology Specialists. Thus quite
clearly the Concentra physician who first saw the claimant recognized the need to
obtain those records as part of the evaluation of claimants condition. The record does
not indicate whether
Category: Panel
03/01/2021
EmployerCarrier's Motion to Compel Claimant's Attendance
at Independent Medical Examination filed February 9 2021 DN 304.
Claimant's Proffered Exhibit
1. Correspondence from Broadspire to Dr. Edgar Ramirez-Pagan dated November 25
2020 DN 304 Exhibit A. 1
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Category: Panel
02/23/2021
Tex. 1998; Hoxie Implement
Co. v. Baker 65 S.W.3d 140145 Tex. App.Amarillo 2001 pet. denied. Even when a
timely objection is made it is waived if substantially similar evidence is subsequently
presented to the jury without objection. Volkswagen of Am. Inc. v. Ramirez 159 S.W.3d
907 Tex
Category: Cases
02/23/2021
the insured
See Ramirez v. Workers Comp. Appeals Bd. 2017 10 Cal.App.5th 205 220 fn. 7.
.
individual did not inform the insurer of that addition or request coverage for the partner
or the partnership. The court found no basis for extending coverage beyond what was
intended by the owner and the
Category: Cases
02/16/2021
the insured
See Ramirez v. Workers Comp. Appeals Bd. 2017 10 Cal.App.5th 205 220 fn. 7.
.
individual did not inform the insurer of that addition or request coverage for the partner
or the partnership. The court found no basis for extending coverage beyond what was
intended by the owner and the
Category: Cases
02/12/2021
One of four people charged in the first-ever application of a 2011 Pennsylvania misclassification law has pleaded guilty.
Armando Garcia- Ramirez 55 owner of G&R Drywall and Framing had been charged with illegally classing workers as independent contractors instead of as employees. He was
Category: News
02/06/2021
Category: Profile