03/01/2023
of Fact;
The Findings of Fact do not support the Order Decision or Award;
By the Decision and Award the Board acted without or in excess of its
powers.
Specifically defendant contends that this WCJ's Findings and Award as it
pertains to the timeliness of the UR denial the violation of Labor Code
Category: Panel
03/01/2023
Filed the Petition.
3.
Timeliness
The Petition is Timely.
Verified
The Petition is Verified.
The Petitioner Contends That
a That the WCJ erred in his Findings & Award by not complying with Labor Code
Section 5313.
b That the WCJ erred in Finding that the Panel QME Dr. Paul Grodans
Category: Panel
02/03/2023
interest.
Analysis The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania said the permitted focus of the fee review process established by the Workers Compensation Act is the amount andor timeliness of the payment from the employer or insurer.
Here the court noted the amount of the payment owed was precisely
Category: News
02/01/2023
Appeals Board for filing supplemental pleadings only where a petition
for reconsideration . . . . has been timely filed and the issue of timeliness is now before us we do not view the separate
pleadings as supplemental pleadings and consider them in their entirety. See Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8
Category: Panel
02/01/2023
the official seal of
the Workers Compensation Appeals
Board to this original decision on this date.
abs
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
I.
Date of Injury
Age on DOI
Occupation
Parts of Body Injured
Identity of Petitioners
Timeliness
Verification
Date of Order
Category: Panel
02/01/2023
this date.
CS
2
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PETITION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
I
INTRODUCTION
Applicant's Occupation Tile Setter
Applicant's Age 43
Date of injury April 11 2017
Parts of Body Inured Lumbar Spine
Identity of Petitioner Applicant
Timeliness Yes
Verification Yes
Date of Findings and
Category: Panel
02/01/2023
Timeliness
Verified
Applicants attorney
The Petition was timely filed
The Petition was verified.
3.
Dates of Minutes of Hearing
December 5 2022
4.
The Petitioner contends
A.
B.
C.
D.
That this WCJ erred in their Findings and Order and that the applicant has been aggrieved
by such Order.
That
Category: Panel
02/01/2023
& JENSEN
HAVara
I certify that I affixed the official seal of the
Workers Compensation Appeals Board to this
original decision on this date.
abs
2
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Oakland Venue
I.
Date of Injury
Party of Body Injured
Petitioner
Timeliness
Verification
Category: Panel
02/01/2023
eyesvision
diabetes and sleep
2. Identity of Petitioner
Defendant The Hartford
Timeliness
Yes
Verification
Yes
3. Date of Findings and Order
November 28 2022
4. Petitioners Contentions
That despite introducing no evidence and making no
motion that the undersigned take judicial
Category: Panel
02/01/2023
official seal of
the Workers Compensation Appeals
Board to this original decision on this date.
CS
2
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION ON
PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
A. INTRODUCTION
1.
IDENTITY OF PETITIONER
Defendant
2.
TIMELINESS
Petition was timely filed.
3.
VERIFICATION
A verification is
Category: Panel