10/01/2019
carefully reviewed and considered all medical evidence along with all
testimony. The Arbitrator concludes that Petitioner has proven by the preponderance of the
credible evidence that his surgical procedures perfonned on November 28. 2016 and December
5 2016 were necessitated as a consequence of the
Category: Panel
10/01/2018
of Applicant to establish a
compensable consequence injury for a different body part as Applicant must first establish that
industrial causation for the primary complaints. Here as indicated above Applicant has failed to do
so. Regardless the parties already obtained a PQME in internal medicine
Category: Panel
06/01/2021
entitled to a credit of 0 under Section 8j of the Act.
ORDER
PETITIONER FAILED TO PROVE THAT SHE SUSTAINED A COMPENSABLE INJURY ARISING OUT OF AND IN
THE COURSE OF HER EMPLOYMENT WITH RESPONDENT. THEREFORE COMPENSATION IS DENIED.
RULES REGARDING APPEALS Unless a party files a Petition for Review
Category: Panel
05/01/2017
001429
to
a
The law with respect an employee having a subsequent injury as a result of
weakened condition from a prior job-related accident and the weakened condition
resulting therefrom is clear namely
"Every natural consequence that flows from an injury that arose out of and in the
course of
Category: Panel
03/01/2022
opinions. Defendants Exhibit 3.
On 3-13-2013 applicants attorney filed an Amended Application for Adjudication
alleging compensable consequence injury to additional body parts including psyche GERD sex
dysfunction weight gain headaches and sleep dysfunction. On 12-18-2014 applicant dismissed
Category: Panel
08/01/2022
diagnostic results. Defendants Exhibit G
QME Report of Hrair E. Darakjian M.D. 1282019 p. 2; Defendants Exhibit
K QME Report of Hrair E. Darakjian M.D. 10092020 p. 2. Likewise Dr.
Scheinbergs speculation that Petitioners lower back pain might be the
compensable consequence of alerted
Category: Panel
05/01/2018
Arbitrator finds that the motor vehicle accidents of February 22 2011 and July 23 2014
caused temporary aggravations of the Petitioner's low back condition; neither event broke the chain
of causation.
Every naturai consequence that flows from an injury that arose out of and in the course of
one's
Category: Panel
04/01/2012
hi.s evidence deposition testified that Petitioner's fall on March 252009 caused abrasions WhI lead to septIC olecranon bursitis. PX41. Dr. Sherman explained that Petitioner's septic olecranon burSItIS whIch developed as a consequence ofa fall on March 252009 caused an infection which spread 4
Category: Panel
02/01/2015
showed no signs of instability or other abnormality
on exam. PR 742-743 He felt that the MRI findings on both the back and the knee were strictly
degenerative in nature. PR 741-742 He acknowledged the radiologists description of a tear
but did not feel this was a finding of any consequence or
Category: Panel
01/01/2013
occurred as a result of use her using her right upper extremity to open and close the door of the school bus. The presiding arbitrator found both claimed injuries were compensable and awarded benefits accordingly. The Commission after reviewing the evidentiary record concludes Petitioner failed to prove
Category: Panel