09/01/2023
Comp. Appeals Bd. Bradford 1986
51 Cal.Comp.Cases 355 writ den. statement by doctor that back condition was
aggravated by work not sufficient to charge applicant with knowledge.
Further the burden of proving that the employee knew or should have known
rests with the employer. This burden
Category: Panel
08/31/2023
The defendants in the case of Earley v. WCAB are likely to ask the state Supreme Court to review the 2nd District Court of Appeal’s decision on the board's “grant for study” practice according to information learned by the Law Offices of Bradford and Barthel.
Category: Industry Insights
08/23/2023
sometimes back pain should be something other than a work injury.
Zane P. Uribarri is a partner at the Law Offices of Bradford & Barthel’s Ontario office. This entry from Bradford & Barthel's blog
Category: Industry Insights
08/02/2023
be simplified by breaking down the seasonal and off-season earnings.
John W. Doud is an associate attorney at Bradford & Barthel’s Woodland Hills office. This entry from Bradford & Barthel's blog
Category: Industry Insights
08/01/2023
BRADFORD & BARTHEL LLP
TLHmc
I certify that I affixed the official seal of the
Workers Compensation Appeals Board to this
original decision on this date.
mc
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT'S
PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
I.
INTRODUCTION
1.
Applicants Occupation
Date of Injury
Parts of
Category: Panel
08/01/2023
not inclusive of potential penalty and
interest for the services provided in the above referenced case.
Lien Claimant being represented by Hans Castro from Synapse and
defendant being represented by Mina Jafary from Bradford &
Barthel agree to resolve the above referenced amount for a total sum
of
Category: Panel
08/01/2023
OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD.
IRMA LOYOLA
LAW OFFICES OF ALAN H. FENTON
LAW OFFICES OF BRADFORD & BARTHEL
JMRara
I certify that I affixed the official seal of the
Workers Compensation Appeals Board to this
original decision on this date.
mc
2
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
I
Category: Panel
07/01/2023
RECORD.
MARISELA GUZMAN
STOUT KAUFMAN HOLZMAN & SPRAGUE
BRADFORD & BARTHEL
DWoo
I certify that I affixed the official
seal of the Workers Compensation
Appeals Board to this original
decision on this date.
o.o
5
Category: Panel
06/26/2023
has plenty of inferences about how one can satisfy the evidentiary burdens.
John P. Kamin is a workers’ compensation defense attorney and equity partner at Bradford & Barthel’s Woodland Hills location. He is WorkCompCentral's former legal editor. This entry from
Category: Industry Insights
06/09/2023
Bradford and Barthel colleagues have noticed that since 2020 many applicants' attorneys have started finding other ways to inflate their requests now that they are not billing two hours of travel to and from the deposition location.
Suddenly reimbursement for “staff review time
Category: Industry Insights