03/30/2012
Category: Profile
03/30/2012
Category: Profile
03/30/2012
Category: Profile
12/01/2010
whether sanctions should be imposed 11i against CMS Network Inc. CMS andor its hearing representatives Dominic D. Arguello and 12 13 Randal Hollien.1 This panel of the Appeals Board was appointed by the Chair to address the issue. On September 8 2009 we issued an Order Consolidating Cases And Notice
Category: Panel
10/01/2009
an Order consolidating the abovecaptioned cases and a notice of intention NIT to impose monetary sanctions on CMS Network Inc. CMS andor its hearing representatives; Dominic D. Arguello and Randal Hollien for their repeated misstatements of law as detailed in the NIT in separate petitions
Category: Panel
07/01/2009
August 20 2001 while employed by defendant is 3145.57. In its petition for reconsideration filed on its behalf by its hearing representative Dominic D. Arguello of CMS Network Inc. CMS S&B contended that it is entitled to 32744.81 the balance of its lien claim arguing that defendant failed
Category: Panel
02/01/2009
RECONSIDERATION AND ORDER GRANTING REMOVAL ON APPEALS BOARD'S MOTION
Lien claimant L.A. Regional Surgery Center LARSC by and through its representative CMS Network Inc. CMS and Dominic D. Arguello Arguello a hearing representative for CMS filed a timely petition seeking reconsideration of the
Category: Panel
02/01/2009
METAL RECYCLING INC.; and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE
9
10
FUND
Defendants.
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Lien claimant S&B Surgery Center S&B by and through its representative CMS Network Inc. CMS and Dominic D. Arguello Arguello a hearing representative
Category: Panel
02/01/2009
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Defendants.
8
9
10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Lien claimant S&B Surgery Center S&B by and through its representative CMS Network Inc. CMS and Dominic D. Arguello Arguello a hearing representative for CMS filed a timely
Category: Panel
01/01/2009
representative Dominic D. Arguello for continuing to make the same erroneous legal assertions in its petitions for reconsideration that defendant bears the initial burden of proving the unreasonableness of a lien." Report at p. 9. For the reasons stated by the WCJ in her Report which we hereby adopt and
Category: Panel