06/01/2019
granted reconsideration in this matter to study the factual and legal
issues. This is
13
our Opinion and Decision After Reconsideration.
t4
Applicant seeks reconsideration of the Findings And order F&o issued
by a workers
compensation administrative law judge wCJ on october 22017
which found
Category: Panel
02/01/2016
reconsideration in this matter to provide an opportunity to further study the legal and
11
factual issues raised by the petition for reconsideration. Having completed our review we now issue our
12
Decision After Reconsideration.
13
Defendant Fire Insurance Exchange on behalf of its insured Grandview
Category: Panel
05/01/2021
2020 Claimant was not at MMI prior to that date
specifically April 14 2020 either. Dr. Wolff's treatment consisted of obtaining an EMG and a
nerve conduction study. As of the last time Dr. Wolff saw Claimant September 29 2020
Claimant had reached MMI with no impairment rating as there is none
Category: Panel
04/01/2013
. Rossi. Petitioner reported bilateral elbow pain noting more severe symptoms in his left elbow. Dr. Rossi referred Petitioner to Dr. Szymke for an EMG and nerve conduction study and Petitioner later saw Dr. Garwacki a neurologist and Dr. Garst who recommended a left medial epicondyle and cubital
Category: Panel
06/01/2022
2019.
Dr. Garileck ordered an MRI study. PX 4.
Petitioner presented for a physiatry consultation with Dr. Sajjad Murtaza on July
12 2019. The examination was two months after Petitioner's work accident. Petitioner
presented with complaints of left-sided low back pain without radiation into his
Category: Panel
08/01/2014
pain in his right lower back. Px 2. The records report slight radiation of pain into
the Petitioner's gluteal area and back pain while walking. Id.
The Petitioner also voluntarily submitted to a drug screen. This v.ias positive for
marijuana and cocaine at low levels. Id. All witnesses who testified
Category: Panel
10/01/2022
RECONSIDERATION
We previously granted reconsideration in order to allow us time to further study the factual
and legal issues in this case. We now issue our Opinion and Decision After Reconsideration.
Defendants Bergitta Groth dba Fairy Forest Farm Groth and Uninsured Employers
Benefits Trust Fund UEBTF
Category: Panel
10/01/2021
RECONSIDERATION
We previously granted reconsideration in order to allow us time to further study the factual
and legal issues in this case. We now issue our Opinion and Decision After Reconsideration.
Defendants Bergitta Groth dba Fairy Forest Farm Groth and Uninsured Employers
Benefits Trust Fund UEBTF
Category: Panel
03/01/2017
ADJ10112122
Oxnard District Office
OPINION AND DECISION
AFTER RECONSIDERATION
11
12
We granted reconsideration in this matter to provide an opportunity to further study the legal and
13
factual issues raised by the Petition for Reconsideration. Having completed our review we now issue our
14
Category: Panel
08/01/2010
the record .is Respondent's Exhibit # 11. The report from that study reads in part as follows "Resulls o ihis drug Sneen Me 0 be lised or medical purposes only. Tne results cannot be used for anY' non-medical purpose such as legal or employment esing. If confirmation of positive streenresulls
Category: Panel