Difference between revisions of "California Labor Codes 3600"

From Wcc
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<table border="0" width="95%">
 
<table border="0" width="95%">
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td width="80%" valign="top">
+
<td width="80%" valign="top">History:
 +
*[[California_Labor Codes_3600_249| Chapter 3 - Conditions of Compensation]]
 +
<br><br>(a) Liability for the compensation provided by this division, in lieu of any other liability whatsoever to any person except as otherwise specifically provided in Sections [[California_Labor_Codes_3602| 3602]], [[California_Labor_Codes_3706| 3706]], and [[California_Labor_Codes_4558| 4558]], shall, without regard to negligence, exist against an employer for any injury sustained by his or her employees arising out of and in the course of the employment and for the death of any employee if the injury proximately causes death, in those cases where the following conditions of compensation concur:
  
(a) Liability for the compensation provided by this division, in lieu of any other liability whatsoever to any person except as otherwise specifically provided in Sections [[California_Labor_Codes_3602| 3602]], [[California_Labor_Codes_3706| 3706]], and [[California_Labor_Codes_4558| 4558]], shall, without regard to negligence, exist against an employer for any injury sustained by his or her employees arising out of and in the course of the employment and for the death of any employee if the injury proximately causes death, in those cases where the following conditions of compensation concur:
+
(1) Where, at the time of the injury, both the employer and the employee are subject to the compensation provisions of this division.
(1) Where, at the time of the injury, both the employer and the employee are subject to the compensation provisions of this division
+
(2) Where, at the time of the injury, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his or her employment and is acting within the course of his or her employment. 
+
(3) Where the injury is proximately caused by the employment, either with or without negligence. 
+
(4) Where the injury is not caused by the intoxication, by alcohol or the unlawful use of a controlled substance, of the injured employee. As used in this paragraph, 'controlled substance' shall have the same meaning as prescribed in Section 11007 of the Health and Safety Code. 
+
(5) Where the injury is not intentionally self-inflicted. 
+
(6) Where the employee has not willfully and deliberately caused his or her own death. 
+
(7) Where the injury does not arise out of an altercation in which the injured employee is the initial physical aggressor. 
+
(8) Where the injury is not caused by the commission of a felony, or a crime which is punishable as specified in subdivision (b) of Section 17 of the Penal Code, by the injured employee, for which he or she has been convicted. 
+
(9) Where the injury does not arise out of voluntary participation in any off-duty recreational, social, or athletic activity not constituting part of the employee's work-related duties, except where these activities are a reasonable expectancy of, or are expressly or impliedly required by, the employment. The administrative director shall promulgate reasonable rules and regulations requiring employers to post and keep posted in a conspicuous place or places a notice advising employees of the provisions of this subdivision. Failure of the employer to post the notice shall not constitute an expression of intent to waive the provisions of this subdivision. 
+
(10) Except for psychiatric injuries governed by subdivision (e) of Section [[California_Labor_Codes_3208.3| 3208.3]], where the claim for compensation is filed after notice of termination or layoff, including voluntary layoff, and the claim is for an injury occurring prior to the time of notice of termination or layoff, no compensation shall be paid unless the employee demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that one or more of the following conditions apply: 
+
(A) The employer has notice of the injury, as provided under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5400| 5400]]), prior to the notice of termination or layoff. 
+
(B) The employee's medical records, existing prior to the notice of termination or layoff, contain evidence of the injury. 
+
(C) The date of injury, as specified in Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5411| 5411]], is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff, but prior to the effective date of the termination or layoff. 
+
(D) The date of injury, as specified in Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5412| 5412]], is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff. For purposes of this paragraph, an employee provided notice pursuant to Sections 44948.5, 44949, 44951, 44955, 44955.6, 72411, 87740, and 87743 of the Education Code shall be considered to have been provided a notice of termination or layoff only upon a district' s final decision not to reemploy that person. A notice of termination or layoff that is not followed within 60 days by that termination or layoff shall not be subject to the provisions of this paragraph, and this paragraph shall not apply until receipt of a later notice of termination or layoff. The issuance of frequent notices of termination or layoff to an employee shall be considered a bad faith personnel action and shall make this paragraph inapplicable to the employee.
+
  
(b) Where an employee, or his or her dependents, receives the compensation provided by this division and secures a judgment for, or settlement of, civil damages pursuant to those specific exemptions to the employee's exclusive remedy set forth in subdivision (b) of Section [[California_Labor_Codes_3602| 3602]] and Section [[California_Labor_Codes_4558| 4558]], the compensation paid under this division shall be credited against the judgment or settlement, and the employer shall be relieved from the obligation to pay further compensation to, or on behalf of, the employee or his or her dependents up to the net amount of the judgment or settlement received by the employee or his or her heirs, or that portion of the judgment as has been satisfied.
+
(2) Where, at the time of the injury, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his or her employment and is acting within the course of his or her employment.
  
 +
(3) Where the injury is proximately caused by the employment, either with or without negligence.
 +
 +
(4) Where the injury is not caused by the intoxication, by alcohol or the unlawful use of a controlled substance, of the injured employee. As used in this paragraph, "controlled substance" shall have the same meaning as prescribed in Section 11007 of the Health and Safety Code.
 +
 +
(5) Where the injury is not intentionally self-inflicted.
 +
 +
(6) Where the employee has not willfully and deliberately caused his or her own death.
 +
 +
(7) Where the injury does not arise out of an altercation in which the injured employee is the initial physical aggressor.
 +
 +
(8) Where the injury is not caused by the commission of a felony, or a crime which is punishable as specified in subdivision (b) of Section 17 of the Penal Code, by the injured employee, for which he or she has been convicted.
 +
 +
(9) Where the injury does not arise out of voluntary participation in any off-duty recreational, social, or athletic activity not constituting part of the employee's work-related duties, except where these activities are a reasonable expectancy of, or are expressly or impliedly required by, the employment. The administrative director shall promulgate reasonable rules and regulations requiring employers to post and keep posted in a conspicuous place or places a notice advising employees of the provisions of this subdivision. Failure of the employer to post the notice shall not constitute an expression of intent to waive the provisions of this subdivision.
 +
 +
(10) Except for psychiatric injuries governed by subdivision (e) of Section [[California_Labor_Codes_3208.3| 3208.3]], where the claim for compensation is filed after notice of termination or layoff, including voluntary layoff, and the claim is for an injury occurring prior to the time of notice of termination or layoff, no compensation shall be paid unless the employee demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that one or more of the following conditions apply:
 +
 +
(A) The employer has notice of the injury, as provided under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5400), prior to the notice of termination or layoff.
 +
 +
(B) The employee's medical records, existing prior to the notice of termination or layoff, contain evidence of the injury.
 +
 +
(C) The date of injury, as specified in Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5411| 5411]], is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff, but prior to the effective date of the termination or layoff.
 +
 +
(D) The date of injury, as specified in Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5412| 5412]], is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff.
 +
 +
For purposes of this paragraph, an employee provided notice pursuant to Sections 44948.5, 44949, 44951, 44955, 72411, 87740, and 87743 of the Education Code shall be considered to have been provided a notice of termination or layoff only upon a district's final decision not to reemploy that person.
 +
 +
A notice of termination or layoff that is not followed within 60 days by that termination or layoff shall not be subject to the provisions of this paragraph, and this paragraph shall not apply until receipt of a later notice of termination or layoff. The issuance of frequent notices of termination or layoff to an employee shall be considered a bad faith personnel action and shall make this paragraph inapplicable to the employee.
 +
 +
(b) Where an employee, or his or her dependents, receives the compensation provided by this division and secures a judgment for, or settlement of, civil damages pursuant to those specific exemptions to the employee's exclusive remedy set forth in subdivision (b) of Section [[California_Labor_Codes_3602| 3602]] and Section [[California_Labor_Codes_4558| 4558]], the compensation paid under this division shall be credited against the judgment or settlement, and the employer shall be relieved from the obligation to pay further compensation to, or on behalf of, the employee or his or her dependents up to the net amount of the judgment or settlement received by the employee or his or her heirs, or that portion of the judgment as has been satisfied.
  
 +
(c) For purposes of determining whether to grant or deny a workers' compensation claim, if an employee is injured or killed by a third party in the course of the employee's employment, no personal relationship or personal connection shall be deemed to exist between the employee and the third party based only on a determination that the third party injured or killed the employee solely because of the third party's personal beliefs relating to his or her perception of the employee's race, religious creed, color, national origin, age, gender, disability, sex, or sexual orientation.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td width="3">&nbsp;</td>
 
<td width="3">&nbsp;</td>
Line 30: Line 48:
  
 
<div id="link1">
 
<div id="link1">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=241810212582418&state=CA Weinstein v. St. Mary's Med. Cntr.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=241810212582418&state=ca Weinstein v. St. Mary's Med. Cntr.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 36: Line 54:
  
 
<div id="link2">
 
<div id="link2">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=241907212272419&state=CA D'Angona v. County of LA]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=241907212272419&state=ca D'Angona v. County of LA]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 42: Line 60:
  
 
<div id="link3">
 
<div id="link3">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=242808212742428&state=CA Gibbs v. American Airlines, Inc.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=242808212742428&state=ca Gibbs v. American Airlines, Inc.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 48: Line 66:
  
 
<div id="link4">
 
<div id="link4">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=243303212482433&state=CA S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dept. of Indus. Rel.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=243303212482433&state=ca S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dept. of Indus. Rel.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 54: Line 72:
  
 
<div id="link5">
 
<div id="link5">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=243508212182435&state=CA Graczyk v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=243508212182435&state=ca Graczyk v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 60: Line 78:
  
 
<div id="link6">
 
<div id="link6">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=258409212122584&state=CA Smith v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=258409212122584&state=ca Smith v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 66: Line 84:
  
 
<div id="link7">
 
<div id="link7">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=280508212142805&state=CA Ezzy v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=280508212142805&state=ca Ezzy v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 72: Line 90:
  
 
<div id="link8">
 
<div id="link8">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=282008212262820&state=CA Torres vs. Parkhouse Tire Service]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=282008212262820&state=ca Torres vs. Parkhouse Tire Service]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 78: Line 96:
  
 
<div id="link9">
 
<div id="link9">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=282806212262828&state=CA Bray vs. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=282806212262828&state=ca Bray vs. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 84: Line 102:
  
 
<div id="link10">
 
<div id="link10">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=283301212sd22833&state=CA Wright v. Beverly Fabrics]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=283301212sd22833&state=ca Wright v. Beverly Fabrics]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 90: Line 108:
  
 
<div id="link11">
 
<div id="link11">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=284604212202846&state=CA Bagatti v. Dept. of Rehab]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=284604212202846&state=ca Bagatti v. Dept. of Rehab]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 96: Line 114:
  
 
<div id="link12">
 
<div id="link12">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=2851032126s2851&state=CA Dimmig v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=2851032126s2851&state=ca Dimmig v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 102: Line 120:
  
 
<div id="link13">
 
<div id="link13">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285202212192852&state=CA Luna v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285202212192852&state=ca Luna v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 108: Line 126:
  
 
<div id="link14">
 
<div id="link14">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285307212122853&state=CA Baroid v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285307212122853&state=ca Baroid v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 114: Line 132:
  
 
<div id="link15">
 
<div id="link15">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285406212892854&state=CA City of San Diego v. WCAB, Molnar]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285406212892854&state=ca City of San Diego v. WCAB, Molnar]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 120: Line 138:
  
 
<div id="link16">
 
<div id="link16">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285505212202855&state=CA Atascadero USD v. WCAB (Geredes)]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285505212202855&state=ca Atascadero USD v. WCAB (Geredes)]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 126: Line 144:
  
 
<div id="link17">
 
<div id="link17">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=286007212272860&state=CA Johns-Manville vs. Sup. Court (Rudkin)]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=286007212272860&state=ca Johns-Manville vs. Sup. Court (Rudkin)]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 132: Line 150:
  
 
<div id="link18">
 
<div id="link18">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=2861072127n2861&state=CA Unruh vs. Truck Ins. Exchange]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=2861072127n2861&state=ca Unruh vs. Truck Ins. Exchange]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 138: Line 156:
  
 
<div id="link19">
 
<div id="link19">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=287408212Ca2874&state=CA Lopez v. C.G.M. Development, Inc.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=287408212Ca2874&state=ca Lopez v. C.G.M. Development, Inc.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 144: Line 162:
  
 
<div id="link20">
 
<div id="link20">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=28760421292876&state=CA Arriaga vs. County of Alameda]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=28760421292876&state=ca Arriaga vs. County of Alameda]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 150: Line 168:
  
 
<div id="link21">
 
<div id="link21">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=288903212232889&state=CA Riverview Fire Protection Dist. v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=288903212232889&state=ca Riverview Fire Protection Dist. v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 156: Line 174:
  
 
<div id="link22">
 
<div id="link22">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=289010212202890&state=CA Salazar vs. Diversified Paratransit, Inc.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=289010212202890&state=ca Salazar vs. Diversified Paratransit, Inc.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 162: Line 180:
  
 
<div id="link23">
 
<div id="link23">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=292604212202926&state=CA Weber v. UPS]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=292604212202926&state=ca Weber v. UPS]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 168: Line 186:
  
 
<div id="link24">
 
<div id="link24">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=3411021212341&state=CA McCarty v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=3411021212341&state=ca McCarty v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 174: Line 192:
  
 
<div id="link25">
 
<div id="link25">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=4020821266402&state=CA Tensfeldt v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=4020821266402&state=ca Tensfeldt v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 180: Line 198:
  
 
<div id="link26">
 
<div id="link26">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=4060521216406&state=CA Rodgers v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=4060521216406&state=ca Rodgers v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 186: Line 204:
  
 
<div id="link27">
 
<div id="link27">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=a256e04k974462lm10k27p&state=CA Jensen vs. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=a256e04k974462lm10k27p&state=ca Jensen vs. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 192: Line 210:
  
 
<div id="link28">
 
<div id="link28">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=a264g07q1449639bc23v14&state=CA Bakersfield City School Dist. v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=a264g07q1449639bc23v14&state=ca Bakersfield City School Dist. v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 198: Line 216:
  
 
<div id="link29">
 
<div id="link29">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=b155j04k852602hi3k2yxe&state=CA Waste Management vs. Superior Court]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=b155j04k852602hi3k2yxe&state=ca Waste Management vs. Superior Court]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 204: Line 222:
  
 
<div id="link30">
 
<div id="link30">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=e194m04h1425807kl35d13&state=CA Mitchel vs. Scott Wetzel Services, Inc.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=b286a09c1295461gh31z55&state=ca Esquivel v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation30" style="display:none">Note: Intentional misconduct by the workers' compensation claims administrator of a self-insured employer falls within the exclusive remedy of work comp.</div>
+
<div id="explanation30" style="display:none">Note: The employer bears the risk of incurring compensability liability under the Act for an injury an employee suffers during travel to or from a medical appointment related to an existing compensable injury while the employee is traveling a reasonable distance, within a reasonable geographic area, to or from that appointment.</div>
  
 
<div id="link31">
 
<div id="link31">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=h269s06a937412vw31z21q&state=CA Pettigrew v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=e194m04h1425807kl35d13&state=ca Mitchel vs. Scott Wetzel Services, Inc.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation31" style="display:none">Note: The employee was not acting as a peace officer at the time he stopped at the accident as his job duties did not require him to stop and render aid.</div>
+
<div id="explanation31" style="display:none">Note: Intentional misconduct by the workers' compensation claims administrator of a self-insured employer falls within the exclusive remedy of work comp.</div>
  
 
<div id="link32">
 
<div id="link32">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=j109i04l661031tu35t39r&state=CA Mason vs. Lake Dolores Group]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=h269s06a937412vw31z21q&state=ca Pettigrew v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation32" style="display:none">Note: Injury that occurs after reporting to work but before 'clocking in' is not AOE/COE.</div>
+
<div id="explanation32" style="display:none">Note: The employee was not acting as a peace officer at the time he stopped at the accident as his job duties did not require him to stop and render aid.</div>
  
 
<div id="link33">
 
<div id="link33">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=k184s07b1759615rs58s31&state=CA Jones v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=j109i04l661031tu35t39r&state=ca Mason vs. Lake Dolores Group]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation33" style="display:none">Note: For conduct committed within the scope of employment, employees, like their employers, should not be held subject to suit. There are, however, statutory exceptions to coemployee immunity. A civil suit is permissible when an employee proximately causes another employee's injury or death by a 'willful and unprovoked physical act of aggression.'</div>
+
<div id="explanation33" style="display:none">Note: Injury that occurs after reporting to work but before 'clocking in' is not AOE/COE.</div>
  
 
<div id="link34">
 
<div id="link34">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=k2a05l617937no46w56xkf&state=CA Privette vs. Superior Court]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=k184s07b1759615rs58s31&state=ca Jones v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation34" style="display:none">Note: Peculiar risk doctrine does not create exception to exclusive remedy of the Work Comp Act.</div>
+
<div id="explanation34" style="display:none">Note: For conduct committed within the scope of employment, employees, like their employers, should not be held subject to suit. There are, however, statutory exceptions to coemployee immunity. A civil suit is permissible when an employee proximately causes another employee's injury or death by a 'willful and unprovoked physical act of aggression.'</div>
  
 
<div id="link35">
 
<div id="link35">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=l2o05s695636st34z31nov&state=CA Bell vs. Agee Construction]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=k2a05l617937no46w56xkf&state=ca Privette vs. Superior Court]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation35" style="display:none">Note: Subcontractor's failure to maintain WC does not create liability for general contractor.</div>
+
<div id="explanation35" style="display:none">Note: Peculiar risk doctrine does not create exception to exclusive remedy of the Work Comp Act.</div>
  
 
<div id="link36">
 
<div id="link36">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=l351z05a1558007jk32n14&state=CA Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. WCAB (Moody)]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=l2o05s695636st34z31nov&state=ca Bell vs. Agee Construction]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation36" style="display:none">Note: Injury sustained while on pleasure trip is not compensable under the going and coming rule.</div>
+
<div id="explanation36" style="display:none">Note: Subcontractor's failure to maintain WC does not create liability for general contractor.</div>
  
 
<div id="link37">
 
<div id="link37">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m180n04x414685kl46s19y&state=CA Hinojosa vs. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=l351z05a1558007jk32n14&state=ca Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. WCAB (Moody)]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation37" style="display:none">Note: Requirement that employee provide own transportation between 'fields' on the job creates compensable injury.</div>
+
<div id="explanation37" style="display:none">Note: Injury sustained while on pleasure trip is not compensable under the going and coming rule.</div>
  
 
<div id="link38">
 
<div id="link38">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m353t07u965309rs55s51r&state=CA Vaught v. State]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m180n04x414685kl46s19y&state=ca Hinojosa vs. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation38" style="display:none">Note: The workers' compensation exclusivity rule of Labor Code section 3602 bars the civil action of plaintiff for injuries plaintiff sustained while residing on state premises.</div>
+
<div id="explanation38" style="display:none">Note: Requirement that employee provide own transportation between 'fields' on the job creates compensable injury.</div>
  
 
<div id="link39">
 
<div id="link39">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m91t08i1177805op12c43w&state=CA Johnson v. John Deere Landscapes, Inc.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m353t07u965309rs55s51r&state=ca Vaught v. State]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation39" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] Although the special employment factors do not unanimously favor a finding of special employment, there is no requirement of unanimity and there was no error in finding that John Deere Landscapes, Inc. was Claimant's 'special employer' and thus the relationship falls under the exclusive remedy provision.</div>
+
<div id="explanation39" style="display:none">Note: The workers' compensation exclusivity rule of Labor Code section 3602 bars the civil action of plaintiff for injuries plaintiff sustained while residing on state premises.</div>
  
 
<div id="link40">
 
<div id="link40">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n137r08m1303881wx32b16&state=CA Tomlin v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m91t08i1177805op12c43w&state=ca Johnson v. John Deere Landscapes, Inc.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation40" style="display:none">Note: Claimant was required by his employer to maintain physical fitness and pass annual, mandatory physical fitness tests. He was injured when he slipped on a sidewalk while on a three-mile training run for his employer-mandated physical fitness test. Under the facts of this case, claimant's injury is compensable pursuant to section 3600, subdivision (a)(9).</div>
+
<div id="explanation40" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] Although the special employment factors do not unanimously favor a finding of special employment, there is no requirement of unanimity and there was no error in finding that John Deere Landscapes, Inc. was Claimant's 'special employer' and thus the relationship falls under the exclusive remedy provision.</div>
  
 
<div id="link41">
 
<div id="link41">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n194r03z77721437c0xxcl&state=CA Operating Engineers v. Johnson]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n137r08m1303881wx32b16&state=ca Tomlin v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation41" style="display:none">Note: Invasion of privacy not barred by exclusive remedy of work comp.</div>
+
<div id="explanation41" style="display:none">Note: Claimant was required by his employer to maintain physical fitness and pass annual, mandatory physical fitness tests. He was injured when he slipped on a sidewalk while on a three-mile training run for his employer-mandated physical fitness test. Under the facts of this case, claimant's injury is compensable pursuant to section 3600, subdivision (a)(9).</div>
  
 
<div id="link42">
 
<div id="link42">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n21g05l1198339pq25m53o&state=CA Laeng vs. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n194r03z77721437c0xxcl&state=ca Operating Engineers v. Johnson]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation42" style="display:none">Note: Injury incurred during the 'tryout' phase of employment is compensable.</div>
+
<div id="explanation42" style="display:none">Note: Invasion of privacy not barred by exclusive remedy of work comp.</div>
  
 
<div id="link43">
 
<div id="link43">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=o180m04j419116xy51i1rl&state=CA Hinson vs. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n21g05l1198339pq25m53o&state=ca Laeng vs. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation43" style="display:none">Note: No 'Going & Coming' if personal transportation on job not a requirement.</div>
+
<div id="explanation43" style="display:none">Note: Injury incurred during the 'tryout' phase of employment is compensable.</div>
  
 
<div id="link44">
 
<div id="link44">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=o224s05u1922957ab25k3l&state=CA Mathews v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=o180m04j419116xy51i1rl&state=ca Hinson vs. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation44" style="display:none">Note: Initial physical aggressor cannot recover workers' compensation benefits.</div>
+
<div id="explanation44" style="display:none">Note: No 'Going & Coming' if personal transportation on job not a requirement.</div>
  
 
<div id="link45">
 
<div id="link45">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=p194d04s1429616tu18l20&state=CA Stoddard vs. Western Employers Ins. Co.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=o224s05u1922957ab25k3l&state=ca Mathews v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation45" style="display:none">Note: Refusal to pay benefits does not take matter out of exclusive remedy bargain of workers' compensation.</div>
+
<div id="explanation45" style="display:none">Note: Initial physical aggressor cannot recover workers' compensation benefits.</div>
  
 
<div id="link46">
 
<div id="link46">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=q104e04v633169vw43s59q&state=CA LaTourtette vs. WCAB, Long Beach Comm Coll Dist]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=p194d04s1429616tu18l20&state=ca Stoddard vs. Western Employers Ins. Co.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation46" style="display:none">Note: Injury or death from a non-occupational disease not compensable unless intervening occupational event.</div>
+
<div id="explanation46" style="display:none">Note: Refusal to pay benefits does not take matter out of exclusive remedy bargain of workers' compensation.</div>
  
 
<div id="link47">
 
<div id="link47">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r104m04y647593de50g5zi&state=CA SCIF vs. WCAB, Cardoza]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=q104e04v633169vw43s59q&state=ca LaTourtette vs. WCAB, Long Beach Comm Coll Dist]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation47" style="display:none">Note: Injury incurred during activity break for comfort of employee is AOE/COE.</div>
+
<div id="explanation47" style="display:none">Note: Injury or death from a non-occupational disease not compensable unless intervening occupational event.</div>
  
 
<div id="link48">
 
<div id="link48">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r245u05b1409917fg19o5l&state=CA Transactron, Inc. v. WCAB (Spears)]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r104m04y647593de50g5zi&state=ca SCIF vs. WCAB, Cardoza]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation48" style="display:none">Note: The role of employment in an act of violence is inconsequential when it merely provides a place where the assailant can find the victim.</div>
+
<div id="explanation48" style="display:none">Note: Injury incurred during activity break for comfort of employee is AOE/COE.</div>
  
 
<div id="link49">
 
<div id="link49">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r298p07g1323748fg38d23&state=CA City of Los Angeles v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r245u05b1409917fg19o5l&state=ca Transactron, Inc. v. WCAB (Spears)]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation49" style="display:none">Note: The commercial traveler doctrine and the special mission exception were incorrectly applied by the lower court in finding that the decedent's death was in the course of his employment and so, the decision is reversed.</div>
+
<div id="explanation49" style="display:none">Note: The role of employment in an act of violence is inconsequential when it merely provides a place where the assailant can find the victim.</div>
  
 
<div id="link50">
 
<div id="link50">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r64b08l1674757qr6y22zc&state=CA Salazar v. Livermore Valley Joint Unified School Dist.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r298p07g1323748fg38d23&state=ca City of Los Angeles v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation50" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] The trial court correctly ruled that workers' compensation benefits are plaintiff's exclusive remedy.</div>
+
<div id="explanation50" style="display:none">Note: The commercial traveler doctrine and the special mission exception were incorrectly applied by the lower court in finding that the decedent's death was in the course of his employment and so, the decision is reversed.</div>
  
 
<div id="link51">
 
<div id="link51">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=s27a06u2188062ab49e3fr&state=CA City of Stockton v. WCAB (Jenneiahn)]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r64b08l1674757qr6y22zc&state=ca Salazar v. Livermore Valley Joint Unified School Dist.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation51" style="display:none">Note: Police officer injured while playing in a pickup game of basketball at a private facility not entitled to workers' compensation benefits.</div>
+
<div id="explanation51" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] The trial court correctly ruled that workers' compensation benefits are plaintiff's exclusive remedy.</div>
  
 
<div id="link52">
 
<div id="link52">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=t163m05h501986op55g19c&state=CA Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=s27a06u2188062ab49e3fr&state=ca City of Stockton v. WCAB (Jenneiahn)]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation52" style="display:none">Note: The commercial traveler rule may not be incorporated into the respondeat superior doctrine.</div>
+
<div id="explanation52" style="display:none">Note: Police officer injured while playing in a pickup game of basketball at a private facility not entitled to workers' compensation benefits.</div>
  
 
<div id="link53">
 
<div id="link53">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=t200h04z872826mn2d48dp&state=CA Rohrback vs. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=t163m05h501986op55g19c&state=ca Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation53" style="display:none">Note: Definition of 'liability' regarding 'genuine doubt' for purposes of 5814 penalty.</div>
+
<div id="explanation53" style="display:none">Note: The commercial traveler rule may not be incorporated into the respondeat superior doctrine.</div>
  
 
<div id="link54">
 
<div id="link54">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w194t04x1483281ab26w5s&state=CA Cervantes vs. Great American Ins. Co.]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=t200h04z872826mn2d48dp&state=ca Rohrback vs. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation54" style="display:none">Note: Wilful delay in payment of benefits does not remove action from exclusive remedy of comp.</div>
+
<div id="explanation54" style="display:none">Note: Definition of 'liability' regarding 'genuine doubt' for purposes of 5814 penalty.</div>
  
 
<div id="link55">
 
<div id="link55">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w23o08p1111466xy5y34zn&state=CA Verga v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w194t04x1483281ab26w5s&state=ca Cervantes vs. Great American Ins. Co.]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation55" style="display:none">Note: In light of the legislative intent in enacting section 3208.3, subdivision (b)(1), the disdainful reactions of co-workers to the claimant's abusive conduct were neither <u>actual events of employment</u> nor the <u>predominant cause</u> of her psychological injuries within the meaning of the statute.</div>
+
<div id="explanation55" style="display:none">Note: Wilful delay in payment of benefits does not remove action from exclusive remedy of comp.</div>
  
 
<div id="link56">
 
<div id="link56">
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w320g07n1621054vw23l46&state=CA Little v. WCAB]
+
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w23o08p1111466xy5y34zn&state=ca Verga v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<div id="explanation56" style="display:none">Note: In light of the legislative intent in enacting section 3208.3, subdivision (b)(1), the disdainful reactions of co-workers to the claimant's abusive conduct were neither <u>actual events of employment</u> nor the <u>predominant cause</u> of her psychological injuries within the meaning of the statute.</div>
 +
 
 +
<div id="link57">
 +
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w320g07n1621054vw23l46&state=ca Little v. WCAB]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div id="explanation56" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] Substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that the petitioner filed a deficient skeletal petition for reconsideration and that he failed to prove he required erectile dysfunction medication on an industrial basis.</div>
+
<div id="explanation57" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] Substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that the petitioner filed a deficient skeletal petition for reconsideration and that he failed to prove he required erectile dysfunction medication on an industrial basis.</div>
  
 
</td>
 
</td>

Revision as of 14:02, 28 October 2009

California > Labor Codes

§ 3600 Chapter 3 - Conditions of Compensation

History:



(a) Liability for the compensation provided by this division, in lieu of any other liability whatsoever to any person except as otherwise specifically provided in Sections 3602, 3706, and 4558, shall, without regard to negligence, exist against an employer for any injury sustained by his or her employees arising out of and in the course of the employment and for the death of any employee if the injury proximately causes death, in those cases where the following conditions of compensation concur:

(1) Where, at the time of the injury, both the employer and the employee are subject to the compensation provisions of this division.

(2) Where, at the time of the injury, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his or her employment and is acting within the course of his or her employment.

(3) Where the injury is proximately caused by the employment, either with or without negligence.

(4) Where the injury is not caused by the intoxication, by alcohol or the unlawful use of a controlled substance, of the injured employee. As used in this paragraph, "controlled substance" shall have the same meaning as prescribed in Section 11007 of the Health and Safety Code.

(5) Where the injury is not intentionally self-inflicted.

(6) Where the employee has not willfully and deliberately caused his or her own death.

(7) Where the injury does not arise out of an altercation in which the injured employee is the initial physical aggressor.

(8) Where the injury is not caused by the commission of a felony, or a crime which is punishable as specified in subdivision (b) of Section 17 of the Penal Code, by the injured employee, for which he or she has been convicted.

(9) Where the injury does not arise out of voluntary participation in any off-duty recreational, social, or athletic activity not constituting part of the employee's work-related duties, except where these activities are a reasonable expectancy of, or are expressly or impliedly required by, the employment. The administrative director shall promulgate reasonable rules and regulations requiring employers to post and keep posted in a conspicuous place or places a notice advising employees of the provisions of this subdivision. Failure of the employer to post the notice shall not constitute an expression of intent to waive the provisions of this subdivision.

(10) Except for psychiatric injuries governed by subdivision (e) of Section 3208.3, where the claim for compensation is filed after notice of termination or layoff, including voluntary layoff, and the claim is for an injury occurring prior to the time of notice of termination or layoff, no compensation shall be paid unless the employee demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that one or more of the following conditions apply:

(A) The employer has notice of the injury, as provided under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5400), prior to the notice of termination or layoff.

(B) The employee's medical records, existing prior to the notice of termination or layoff, contain evidence of the injury.

(C) The date of injury, as specified in Section 5411, is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff, but prior to the effective date of the termination or layoff.

(D) The date of injury, as specified in Section 5412, is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff.

For purposes of this paragraph, an employee provided notice pursuant to Sections 44948.5, 44949, 44951, 44955, 72411, 87740, and 87743 of the Education Code shall be considered to have been provided a notice of termination or layoff only upon a district's final decision not to reemploy that person.

A notice of termination or layoff that is not followed within 60 days by that termination or layoff shall not be subject to the provisions of this paragraph, and this paragraph shall not apply until receipt of a later notice of termination or layoff. The issuance of frequent notices of termination or layoff to an employee shall be considered a bad faith personnel action and shall make this paragraph inapplicable to the employee.

(b) Where an employee, or his or her dependents, receives the compensation provided by this division and secures a judgment for, or settlement of, civil damages pursuant to those specific exemptions to the employee's exclusive remedy set forth in subdivision (b) of Section 3602 and Section 4558, the compensation paid under this division shall be credited against the judgment or settlement, and the employer shall be relieved from the obligation to pay further compensation to, or on behalf of, the employee or his or her dependents up to the net amount of the judgment or settlement received by the employee or his or her heirs, or that portion of the judgment as has been satisfied.

(c) For purposes of determining whether to grant or deny a workers' compensation claim, if an employee is injured or killed by a third party in the course of the employee's employment, no personal relationship or personal connection shall be deemed to exist between the employee and the third party based only on a determination that the third party injured or killed the employee solely because of the third party's personal beliefs relating to his or her perception of the employee's race, religious creed, color, national origin, age, gender, disability, sex, or sexual orientation.

  Relevant Case Law