Difference between revisions of "California Labor Codes 3600"

From Wcc
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<table border="0" width="95%">
 
<table border="0" width="95%">
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td width="80%" valign="top">
+
<td width="80%" valign="top">History:
 +
*[[California_Labor Codes_3600_249| Amended By AB 1093 10/11/09; effective 1/1/2010]]
 +
<br><br>(a) Liability for the compensation provided by this division, in lieu of any other liability whatsoever to any person except as otherwise specifically provided in Sections [[California_Labor_Codes_3602| 3602]], [[California_Labor_Codes_3706| 3706]], and [[California_Labor_Codes_4558| 4558]], shall, without regard to negligence, exist against an employer for any injury sustained by his or her employees arising out of and in the course of the employment and for the death of any employee if the injury proximately causes death, in those cases where the following conditions of compensation concur:
  
(a) Liability for the compensation provided by this division, in lieu of any other liability whatsoever to any person except as otherwise specifically provided in Sections [[California_Labor_Codes_3602| 3602]], [[California_Labor_Codes_3706| 3706]], and [[California_Labor_Codes_4558| 4558]], shall, without regard to negligence, exist against an employer for any injury sustained by his or her employees arising out of and in the course of the employment and for the death of any employee if the injury proximately causes death, in those cases where the following conditions of compensation concur:
+
(1) Where, at the time of the injury, both the employer and the employee are subject to the compensation provisions of this division.
(1) Where, at the time of the injury, both the employer and the employee are subject to the compensation provisions of this division
+
(2) Where, at the time of the injury, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his or her employment and is acting within the course of his or her employment. 
+
(3) Where the injury is proximately caused by the employment, either with or without negligence. 
+
(4) Where the injury is not caused by the intoxication, by alcohol or the unlawful use of a controlled substance, of the injured employee. As used in this paragraph, 'controlled substance' shall have the same meaning as prescribed in Section 11007 of the Health and Safety Code. 
+
(5) Where the injury is not intentionally self-inflicted. 
+
(6) Where the employee has not willfully and deliberately caused his or her own death. 
+
(7) Where the injury does not arise out of an altercation in which the injured employee is the initial physical aggressor. 
+
(8) Where the injury is not caused by the commission of a felony, or a crime which is punishable as specified in subdivision (b) of Section 17 of the Penal Code, by the injured employee, for which he or she has been convicted. 
+
(9) Where the injury does not arise out of voluntary participation in any off-duty recreational, social, or athletic activity not constituting part of the employee's work-related duties, except where these activities are a reasonable expectancy of, or are expressly or impliedly required by, the employment. The administrative director shall promulgate reasonable rules and regulations requiring employers to post and keep posted in a conspicuous place or places a notice advising employees of the provisions of this subdivision. Failure of the employer to post the notice shall not constitute an expression of intent to waive the provisions of this subdivision. 
+
(10) Except for psychiatric injuries governed by subdivision (e) of Section [[California_Labor_Codes_3208.3| 3208.3]], where the claim for compensation is filed after notice of termination or layoff, including voluntary layoff, and the claim is for an injury occurring prior to the time of notice of termination or layoff, no compensation shall be paid unless the employee demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that one or more of the following conditions apply: 
+
(A) The employer has notice of the injury, as provided under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5400| 5400]]), prior to the notice of termination or layoff. 
+
(B) The employee's medical records, existing prior to the notice of termination or layoff, contain evidence of the injury. 
+
(C) The date of injury, as specified in Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5411| 5411]], is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff, but prior to the effective date of the termination or layoff. 
+
(D) The date of injury, as specified in Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5412| 5412]], is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff. For purposes of this paragraph, an employee provided notice pursuant to Sections 44948.5, 44949, 44951, 44955, 44955.6, 72411, 87740, and 87743 of the Education Code shall be considered to have been provided a notice of termination or layoff only upon a district' s final decision not to reemploy that person. A notice of termination or layoff that is not followed within 60 days by that termination or layoff shall not be subject to the provisions of this paragraph, and this paragraph shall not apply until receipt of a later notice of termination or layoff. The issuance of frequent notices of termination or layoff to an employee shall be considered a bad faith personnel action and shall make this paragraph inapplicable to the employee.
+
  
(b) Where an employee, or his or her dependents, receives the compensation provided by this division and secures a judgment for, or settlement of, civil damages pursuant to those specific exemptions to the employee's exclusive remedy set forth in subdivision (b) of Section [[California_Labor_Codes_3602| 3602]] and Section [[California_Labor_Codes_4558| 4558]], the compensation paid under this division shall be credited against the judgment or settlement, and the employer shall be relieved from the obligation to pay further compensation to, or on behalf of, the employee or his or her dependents up to the net amount of the judgment or settlement received by the employee or his or her heirs, or that portion of the judgment as has been satisfied.
+
(2) Where, at the time of the injury, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his or her employment and is acting within the course of his or her employment.
  
 +
(3) Where the injury is proximately caused by the employment, either with or without negligence.
 +
 +
(4) Where the injury is not caused by the intoxication, by alcohol or the unlawful use of a controlled substance, of the injured employee. As used in this paragraph, "controlled substance" shall have the same meaning as prescribed in Section 11007 of the Health and Safety Code.
 +
 +
(5) Where the injury is not intentionally self-inflicted.
 +
 +
(6) Where the employee has not willfully and deliberately caused his or her own death.
 +
 +
(7) Where the injury does not arise out of an altercation in which the injured employee is the initial physical aggressor.
 +
 +
(8) Where the injury is not caused by the commission of a felony, or a crime which is punishable as specified in subdivision (b) of Section 17 of the Penal Code, by the injured employee, for which he or she has been convicted.
 +
 +
(9) Where the injury does not arise out of voluntary participation in any off-duty recreational, social, or athletic activity not constituting part of the employee's work-related duties, except where these activities are a reasonable expectancy of, or are expressly or impliedly required by, the employment. The administrative director shall promulgate reasonable rules and regulations requiring employers to post and keep posted in a conspicuous place or places a notice advising employees of the provisions of this subdivision. Failure of the employer to post the notice shall not constitute an expression of intent to waive the provisions of this subdivision.
 +
 +
(10) Except for psychiatric injuries governed by subdivision (e) of Section [[California_Labor_Codes_3208.3| 3208.3]], where the claim for compensation is filed after notice of termination or layoff, including voluntary layoff, and the claim is for an injury occurring prior to the time of notice of termination or layoff, no compensation shall be paid unless the employee demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that one or more of the following conditions apply:
 +
 +
(A) The employer has notice of the injury, as provided under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5400), prior to the notice of termination or layoff.
 +
 +
(B) The employee's medical records, existing prior to the notice of termination or layoff, contain evidence of the injury.
 +
 +
(C) The date of injury, as specified in Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5411| 5411]], is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff, but prior to the effective date of the termination or layoff.
 +
 +
(D) The date of injury, as specified in Section [[California_Labor_Codes_5412| 5412]], is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff.
 +
 +
For purposes of this paragraph, an employee provided notice pursuant to Sections 44948.5, 44949, 44951, 44955, 72411, 87740, and 87743 of the Education Code shall be considered to have been provided a notice of termination or layoff only upon a district's final decision not to reemploy that person.
 +
 +
A notice of termination or layoff that is not followed within 60 days by that termination or layoff shall not be subject to the provisions of this paragraph, and this paragraph shall not apply until receipt of a later notice of termination or layoff. The issuance of frequent notices of termination or layoff to an employee shall be considered a bad faith personnel action and shall make this paragraph inapplicable to the employee.
 +
 +
(b) Where an employee, or his or her dependents, receives the compensation provided by this division and secures a judgment for, or settlement of, civil damages pursuant to those specific exemptions to the employee's exclusive remedy set forth in subdivision (b) of Section [[California_Labor_Codes_3602| 3602]] and Section [[California_Labor_Codes_4558| 4558]], the compensation paid under this division shall be credited against the judgment or settlement, and the employer shall be relieved from the obligation to pay further compensation to, or on behalf of, the employee or his or her dependents up to the net amount of the judgment or settlement received by the employee or his or her heirs, or that portion of the judgment as has been satisfied.
  
 +
(c) For purposes of determining whether to grant or deny a workers' compensation claim, if an employee is injured or killed by a third party in the course of the employee's employment, no personal relationship or personal connection shall be deemed to exist between the employee and the third party based only on a determination that the third party injured or killed the employee solely because of the third party's personal beliefs relating to his or her perception of the employee's race, religious creed, color, national origin, age, gender, disability, sex, or sexual orientation.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
<td width="3">&nbsp;</td>
 
<td width="3">&nbsp;</td>
 
<td width="20%" valign="top"><b>Relevant Case Law</b>
 
<td width="20%" valign="top"><b>Relevant Case Law</b>
  
 +
<div id="link1">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=241810212582418&state=CA Weinstein v. St. Mary's Med. Cntr.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=241810212582418&state=CA Weinstein v. St. Mary's Med. Cntr.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Exclusive remedy only applies when duty arises from employment relationship.
+
<div id="explanation1" style="display:none">Note: Exclusive remedy only applies when duty arises from employment relationship.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link2">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=241907212272419&state=CA D'Angona v. County of LA]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=241907212272419&state=CA D'Angona v. County of LA]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Hospital treating injured employee is not an employer; dual capacity exception to exclusive remedy applies.
+
<div id="explanation2" style="display:none">Note: Hospital treating injured employee is not an employer; dual capacity exception to exclusive remedy applies.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link3">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=242808212742428&state=CA Gibbs v. American Airlines, Inc.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=242808212742428&state=CA Gibbs v. American Airlines, Inc.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Secured compensation presumed in cases of employment relationship and work-related injury.
+
<div id="explanation3" style="display:none">Note: Secured compensation presumed in cases of employment relationship and work-related injury.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link4">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=243303212482433&state=CA S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dept. of Indus. Rel.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=243303212482433&state=CA S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dept. of Indus. Rel.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Employers not required to secure compensation for non-employees, e.g. indep. contractors.
+
<div id="explanation4" style="display:none">Note: Employers not required to secure compensation for non-employees, e.g. indep. contractors.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link5">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=243508212182435&state=CA Graczyk v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=243508212182435&state=CA Graczyk v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Scholarship athletes are not employees; applies retroactively.
+
<div id="explanation5" style="display:none">Note: Scholarship athletes are not employees; applies retroactively.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link6">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=258409212122584&state=CA Smith v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=258409212122584&state=CA Smith v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Employer's burden met b/c intoxication was substantial factor in accident.
+
<div id="explanation6" style="display:none">Note: Employer's burden met b/c intoxication was substantial factor in accident.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link7">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=280508212142805&state=CA Ezzy v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=280508212142805&state=CA Ezzy v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Law clerk injured in employer-sponsored softball game rx. believed was in course of employment.
+
<div id="explanation7" style="display:none">Note: Law clerk injured in employer-sponsored softball game rx. believed was in course of employment.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link8">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=282008212262820&state=CA Torres vs. Parkhouse Tire Service]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=282008212262820&state=CA Torres vs. Parkhouse Tire Service]
 +
</div>
  
Note: In civil action against another employee, injured worker must prove intent to injure.
+
<div id="explanation8" style="display:none">Note: In civil action against another employee, injured worker must prove intent to injure.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link9">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=282806212262828&state=CA Bray vs. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=282806212262828&state=CA Bray vs. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Psyche injury arising solely out of termination not compensable.
+
<div id="explanation9" style="display:none">Note: Psyche injury arising solely out of termination not compensable.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link10">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=283301212sd22833&state=CA Wright v. Beverly Fabrics]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=283301212sd22833&state=CA Wright v. Beverly Fabrics]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Work comp exclusive remedy for injuries sustained while performing tasks within employment contract but outside normal work hours even if not compensated.
+
<div id="explanation10" style="display:none">Note: Work comp exclusive remedy for injuries sustained while performing tasks within employment contract but outside normal work hours even if not compensated.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link11">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=284604212202846&state=CA Bagatti v. Dept. of Rehab]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=284604212202846&state=CA Bagatti v. Dept. of Rehab]
 +
</div>
  
Note: FEHA suit is not barred by exclusive remedy doctrine.
+
<div id="explanation11" style="display:none">Note: FEHA suit is not barred by exclusive remedy doctrine.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link12">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=2851032126s2851&state=CA Dimmig v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=2851032126s2851&state=CA Dimmig v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Going and coming: commuting to and from work not in scope of employment.
+
<div id="explanation12" style="display:none">Note: Going and coming: commuting to and from work not in scope of employment.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link13">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285202212192852&state=CA Luna v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285202212192852&state=CA Luna v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Going and coming: requirements to find special mission an exception to rule.
+
<div id="explanation13" style="display:none">Note: Going and coming: requirements to find special mission an exception to rule.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link14">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285307212122853&state=CA Baroid v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285307212122853&state=CA Baroid v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Discussion of exceptions to 'going and coming' rule.
+
<div id="explanation14" style="display:none">Note: Discussion of exceptions to 'going and coming' rule.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link15">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285406212892854&state=CA City of San Diego v. WCAB, Molnar]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285406212892854&state=CA City of San Diego v. WCAB, Molnar]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Police officer commuting to testify precluded by 'going and coming' rule.
+
<div id="explanation15" style="display:none">Note: Police officer commuting to testify precluded by 'going and coming' rule.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link16">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285505212202855&state=CA Atascadero USD v. WCAB (Geredes)]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=285505212202855&state=CA Atascadero USD v. WCAB (Geredes)]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Gossip insufficient to support claim for psychiatric injury.
+
<div id="explanation16" style="display:none">Note: Gossip insufficient to support claim for psychiatric injury.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link17">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=286007212272860&state=CA Johns-Manville vs. Sup. Court (Rudkin)]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=286007212272860&state=CA Johns-Manville vs. Sup. Court (Rudkin)]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Employer civil liability if conceals knowledge of potential injury and connection with employment.
+
<div id="explanation17" style="display:none">Note: Employer civil liability if conceals knowledge of potential injury and connection with employment.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link18">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=2861072127n2861&state=CA Unruh vs. Truck Ins. Exchange]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=2861072127n2861&state=CA Unruh vs. Truck Ins. Exchange]
 +
</div>
  
Note: WCAB has exclusive jurisdiction on negligent acts of carrier, but not intentional; Employer may 'set off' award against civil damages.
+
<div id="explanation18" style="display:none">Note: WCAB has exclusive jurisdiction on negligent acts of carrier, but not intentional; Employer may 'set off' award against civil damages.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link19">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=287408212Ca2874&state=CA Lopez v. C.G.M. Development, Inc.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=287408212Ca2874&state=CA Lopez v. C.G.M. Development, Inc.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Injured employee of uninsured subcontractor cannot sue property owner.
+
<div id="explanation19" style="display:none">Note: Injured employee of uninsured subcontractor cannot sue property owner.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link20">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=28760421292876&state=CA Arriaga vs. County of Alameda]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=28760421292876&state=CA Arriaga vs. County of Alameda]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Person convicted of crime but not incarcerated, who performs community service in lieu of paying a fine, is an employee.
+
<div id="explanation20" style="display:none">Note: Person convicted of crime but not incarcerated, who performs community service in lieu of paying a fine, is an employee.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link21">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=288903212232889&state=CA Riverview Fire Protection Dist. v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=288903212232889&state=CA Riverview Fire Protection Dist. v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Presumption of cancer in firefighters eliminates need to show that cancer proximately caused by exposure to carcinogens.
+
<div id="explanation21" style="display:none">Note: Presumption of cancer in firefighters eliminates need to show that cancer proximately caused by exposure to carcinogens.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link22">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=289010212202890&state=CA Salazar vs. Diversified Paratransit, Inc.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=289010212202890&state=CA Salazar vs. Diversified Paratransit, Inc.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Sexual harassment of an employee by a non-employee is work comp exclusively, not FEHA.
+
<div id="explanation22" style="display:none">Note: Sexual harassment of an employee by a non-employee is work comp exclusively, not FEHA.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link23">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=292604212202926&state=CA Weber v. UPS]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=292604212202926&state=CA Weber v. UPS]
 +
</div>
  
Note: No civil liability of employer for injuries from failure to diagnose condition that should have been detected on required med exam.
+
<div id="explanation23" style="display:none">Note: No civil liability of employer for injuries from failure to diagnose condition that should have been detected on required med exam.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link24">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=3411021212341&state=CA McCarty v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=3411021212341&state=CA McCarty v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Intoxication not a defense where employer permits consumption of alcohol.
+
<div id="explanation24" style="display:none">Note: Intoxication not a defense where employer permits consumption of alcohol.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link25">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=4020821266402&state=CA Tensfeldt v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=4020821266402&state=CA Tensfeldt v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Conviction of fraud bars applicant from receiving any compensation under 3207.
+
<div id="explanation25" style="display:none">Note: Conviction of fraud bars applicant from receiving any compensation under 3207.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link26">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=4060521216406&state=CA Rodgers v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=4060521216406&state=CA Rodgers v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Employer required to pay ordinary comp. benefits if applicant injured in voc. rehab.
+
<div id="explanation26" style="display:none">Note: Employer required to pay ordinary comp. benefits if applicant injured in voc. rehab.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link27">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=a256e04k974462lm10k27p&state=CA Jensen vs. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=a256e04k974462lm10k27p&state=CA Jensen vs. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: No 'grace period' for delay in payment provided by the statutory right to reconsideration or appellate review.
+
<div id="explanation27" style="display:none">Note: No 'grace period' for delay in payment provided by the statutory right to reconsideration or appellate review.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link28">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=a264g07q1449639bc23v14&state=CA Bakersfield City School Dist. v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=a264g07q1449639bc23v14&state=CA Bakersfield City School Dist. v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: [Unpublished] In light of his perception of danger to schools in the vicinity, combined with an absence of a specific employment policy prohibiting his conduct, the employee acted reasonably when engaging in a minor deviation from the course of his employment  to assist the police in apprehending a fleeing suspect.
+
<div id="explanation28" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] In light of his perception of danger to schools in the vicinity, combined with an absence of a specific employment policy prohibiting his conduct, the employee acted reasonably when engaging in a minor deviation from the course of his employment  to assist the police in apprehending a fleeing suspect.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link29">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=b155j04k852602hi3k2yxe&state=CA Waste Management vs. Superior Court]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=b155j04k852602hi3k2yxe&state=CA Waste Management vs. Superior Court]
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div id="explanation29" style="display:none">Note: Parent not liable to employee of subsidiary for injury/death where parent lacked control.</div>
 +
 +
<div id="link30">
 +
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=b286a09c1295461gh31z55&state=CA Esquivel v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Parent not liable to employee of subsidiary for injury/death where parent lacked control.
+
<div id="explanation30" style="display:none">Note: The employer bears the risk of incurring compensability liability under the Act for an injury an employee suffers during travel to or from a medical appointment related to an existing compensable injury while the employee is traveling a reasonable distance, within a reasonable geographic area, to or from that appointment.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link31">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=e194m04h1425807kl35d13&state=CA Mitchel vs. Scott Wetzel Services, Inc.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=e194m04h1425807kl35d13&state=CA Mitchel vs. Scott Wetzel Services, Inc.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Intentional misconduct by the workers' compensation claims administrator of a self-insured employer falls within the exclusive remedy of work comp.
+
<div id="explanation31" style="display:none">Note: Intentional misconduct by the workers' compensation claims administrator of a self-insured employer falls within the exclusive remedy of work comp.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link32">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=h269s06a937412vw31z21q&state=CA Pettigrew v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=h269s06a937412vw31z21q&state=CA Pettigrew v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: The employee was not acting as a peace officer at the time he stopped at the accident as his job duties did not require him to stop and render aid.
+
<div id="explanation32" style="display:none">Note: The employee was not acting as a peace officer at the time he stopped at the accident as his job duties did not require him to stop and render aid.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link33">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=j109i04l661031tu35t39r&state=CA Mason vs. Lake Dolores Group]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=j109i04l661031tu35t39r&state=CA Mason vs. Lake Dolores Group]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Injury that occurs after reporting to work but before 'clocking in' is not AOE/COE.
+
<div id="explanation33" style="display:none">Note: Injury that occurs after reporting to work but before 'clocking in' is not AOE/COE.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link34">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=k184s07b1759615rs58s31&state=CA Jones v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=k184s07b1759615rs58s31&state=CA Jones v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation]
 +
</div>
  
Note: For conduct committed within the scope of employment, employees, like their employers, should not be held subject to suit. There are, however, statutory exceptions to coemployee immunity. A civil suit is permissible when an employee proximately causes another employee's injury or death by a 'willful and unprovoked physical act of aggression.'
+
<div id="explanation34" style="display:none">Note: For conduct committed within the scope of employment, employees, like their employers, should not be held subject to suit. There are, however, statutory exceptions to coemployee immunity. A civil suit is permissible when an employee proximately causes another employee's injury or death by a 'willful and unprovoked physical act of aggression.'</div>
  
 +
<div id="link35">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=k2a05l617937no46w56xkf&state=CA Privette vs. Superior Court]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=k2a05l617937no46w56xkf&state=CA Privette vs. Superior Court]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Peculiar risk doctrine does not create exception to exclusive remedy of the Work Comp Act.
+
<div id="explanation35" style="display:none">Note: Peculiar risk doctrine does not create exception to exclusive remedy of the Work Comp Act.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link36">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=l2o05s695636st34z31nov&state=CA Bell vs. Agee Construction]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=l2o05s695636st34z31nov&state=CA Bell vs. Agee Construction]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Subcontractor's failure to maintain WC does not create liability for general contractor.
+
<div id="explanation36" style="display:none">Note: Subcontractor's failure to maintain WC does not create liability for general contractor.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link37">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=l351z05a1558007jk32n14&state=CA Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. WCAB (Moody)]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=l351z05a1558007jk32n14&state=CA Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. WCAB (Moody)]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Injury sustained while on pleasure trip is not compensable under the going and coming rule.
+
<div id="explanation37" style="display:none">Note: Injury sustained while on pleasure trip is not compensable under the going and coming rule.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link38">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m180n04x414685kl46s19y&state=CA Hinojosa vs. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m180n04x414685kl46s19y&state=CA Hinojosa vs. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Requirement that employee provide own transportation between 'fields' on the job creates compensable injury.
+
<div id="explanation38" style="display:none">Note: Requirement that employee provide own transportation between 'fields' on the job creates compensable injury.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link39">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m353t07u965309rs55s51r&state=CA Vaught v. State]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m353t07u965309rs55s51r&state=CA Vaught v. State]
 +
</div>
  
Note: The workers' compensation exclusivity rule of Labor Code section 3602 bars the civil action of plaintiff for injuries plaintiff sustained while residing on state premises.
+
<div id="explanation39" style="display:none">Note: The workers' compensation exclusivity rule of Labor Code section 3602 bars the civil action of plaintiff for injuries plaintiff sustained while residing on state premises.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link40">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m91t08i1177805op12c43w&state=CA Johnson v. John Deere Landscapes, Inc.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=m91t08i1177805op12c43w&state=CA Johnson v. John Deere Landscapes, Inc.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: [Unpublished] Although the special employment factors do not unanimously favor a finding of special employment, there is no requirement of unanimity and there was no error in finding that John Deere Landscapes, Inc. was Claimant's 'special employer' and thus the relationship falls under the exclusive remedy provision.
+
<div id="explanation40" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] Although the special employment factors do not unanimously favor a finding of special employment, there is no requirement of unanimity and there was no error in finding that John Deere Landscapes, Inc. was Claimant's 'special employer' and thus the relationship falls under the exclusive remedy provision.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link41">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n137r08m1303881wx32b16&state=CA Tomlin v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n137r08m1303881wx32b16&state=CA Tomlin v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Claimant was required by his employer to maintain physical fitness and pass annual, mandatory physical fitness tests. He was injured when he slipped on a sidewalk while on a three-mile training run for his employer-mandated physical fitness test. Under the facts of this case, claimant's injury is compensable pursuant to section 3600, subdivision (a)(9).
+
<div id="explanation41" style="display:none">Note: Claimant was required by his employer to maintain physical fitness and pass annual, mandatory physical fitness tests. He was injured when he slipped on a sidewalk while on a three-mile training run for his employer-mandated physical fitness test. Under the facts of this case, claimant's injury is compensable pursuant to section 3600, subdivision (a)(9).</div>
  
 +
<div id="link42">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n194r03z77721437c0xxcl&state=CA Operating Engineers v. Johnson]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n194r03z77721437c0xxcl&state=CA Operating Engineers v. Johnson]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Invasion of privacy not barred by exclusive remedy of work comp.
+
<div id="explanation42" style="display:none">Note: Invasion of privacy not barred by exclusive remedy of work comp.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link43">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n21g05l1198339pq25m53o&state=CA Laeng vs. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=n21g05l1198339pq25m53o&state=CA Laeng vs. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Injury incurred during the 'tryout' phase of employment is compensable.
+
<div id="explanation43" style="display:none">Note: Injury incurred during the 'tryout' phase of employment is compensable.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link44">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=o180m04j419116xy51i1rl&state=CA Hinson vs. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=o180m04j419116xy51i1rl&state=CA Hinson vs. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: No 'Going & Coming' if personal transportation on job not a requirement.
+
<div id="explanation44" style="display:none">Note: No 'Going & Coming' if personal transportation on job not a requirement.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link45">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=o224s05u1922957ab25k3l&state=CA Mathews v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=o224s05u1922957ab25k3l&state=CA Mathews v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Initial physical aggressor cannot recover workers' compensation benefits.
+
<div id="explanation45" style="display:none">Note: Initial physical aggressor cannot recover workers' compensation benefits.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link46">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=p194d04s1429616tu18l20&state=CA Stoddard vs. Western Employers Ins. Co.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=p194d04s1429616tu18l20&state=CA Stoddard vs. Western Employers Ins. Co.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Refusal to pay benefits does not take matter out of exclusive remedy bargain of workers' compensation.
+
<div id="explanation46" style="display:none">Note: Refusal to pay benefits does not take matter out of exclusive remedy bargain of workers' compensation.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link47">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=q104e04v633169vw43s59q&state=CA LaTourtette vs. WCAB, Long Beach Comm Coll Dist]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=q104e04v633169vw43s59q&state=CA LaTourtette vs. WCAB, Long Beach Comm Coll Dist]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Injury or death from a non-occupational disease not compensable unless intervening occupational event.
+
<div id="explanation47" style="display:none">Note: Injury or death from a non-occupational disease not compensable unless intervening occupational event.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link48">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r104m04y647593de50g5zi&state=CA SCIF vs. WCAB, Cardoza]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r104m04y647593de50g5zi&state=CA SCIF vs. WCAB, Cardoza]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Injury incurred during activity break for comfort of employee is AOE/COE.
+
<div id="explanation48" style="display:none">Note: Injury incurred during activity break for comfort of employee is AOE/COE.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link49">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r245u05b1409917fg19o5l&state=CA Transactron, Inc. v. WCAB (Spears)]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r245u05b1409917fg19o5l&state=CA Transactron, Inc. v. WCAB (Spears)]
 +
</div>
  
Note: The role of employment in an act of violence is inconsequential when it merely provides a place where the assailant can find the victim.
+
<div id="explanation49" style="display:none">Note: The role of employment in an act of violence is inconsequential when it merely provides a place where the assailant can find the victim.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link50">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r298p07g1323748fg38d23&state=CA City of Los Angeles v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r298p07g1323748fg38d23&state=CA City of Los Angeles v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: The commercial traveler doctrine and the special mission exception were incorrectly applied by the lower court in finding that the decedent's death was in the course of his employment and so, the decision is reversed.
+
<div id="explanation50" style="display:none">Note: The commercial traveler doctrine and the special mission exception were incorrectly applied by the lower court in finding that the decedent's death was in the course of his employment and so, the decision is reversed.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link51">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r64b08l1674757qr6y22zc&state=CA Salazar v. Livermore Valley Joint Unified School Dist.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=r64b08l1674757qr6y22zc&state=CA Salazar v. Livermore Valley Joint Unified School Dist.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: [Unpublished] The trial court correctly ruled that workers' compensation benefits are plaintiff's exclusive remedy.
+
<div id="explanation51" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] The trial court correctly ruled that workers' compensation benefits are plaintiff's exclusive remedy.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link52">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=s27a06u2188062ab49e3fr&state=CA City of Stockton v. WCAB (Jenneiahn)]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=s27a06u2188062ab49e3fr&state=CA City of Stockton v. WCAB (Jenneiahn)]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Police officer injured while playing in a pickup game of basketball at a private facility not entitled to workers' compensation benefits.
+
<div id="explanation52" style="display:none">Note: Police officer injured while playing in a pickup game of basketball at a private facility not entitled to workers' compensation benefits.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link53">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=t163m05h501986op55g19c&state=CA Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=t163m05h501986op55g19c&state=CA Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin]
 +
</div>
  
Note: The commercial traveler rule may not be incorporated into the respondeat superior doctrine.
+
<div id="explanation53" style="display:none">Note: The commercial traveler rule may not be incorporated into the respondeat superior doctrine.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link54">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=t200h04z872826mn2d48dp&state=CA Rohrback vs. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=t200h04z872826mn2d48dp&state=CA Rohrback vs. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Definition of 'liability' regarding 'genuine doubt' for purposes of 5814 penalty.
+
<div id="explanation54" style="display:none">Note: Definition of 'liability' regarding 'genuine doubt' for purposes of 5814 penalty.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link55">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w194t04x1483281ab26w5s&state=CA Cervantes vs. Great American Ins. Co.]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w194t04x1483281ab26w5s&state=CA Cervantes vs. Great American Ins. Co.]
 +
</div>
  
Note: Wilful delay in payment of benefits does not remove action from exclusive remedy of comp.
+
<div id="explanation55" style="display:none">Note: Wilful delay in payment of benefits does not remove action from exclusive remedy of comp.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link56">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w23o08p1111466xy5y34zn&state=CA Verga v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w23o08p1111466xy5y34zn&state=CA Verga v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: In light of the legislative intent in enacting section 3208.3, subdivision (b)(1), the disdainful reactions of co-workers to the claimant's abusive conduct were neither <u>actual events of employment</u> nor the <u>predominant cause</u> of her psychological injuries within the meaning of the statute.
+
<div id="explanation56" style="display:none">Note: In light of the legislative intent in enacting section 3208.3, subdivision (b)(1), the disdainful reactions of co-workers to the claimant's abusive conduct were neither <u>actual events of employment</u> nor the <u>predominant cause</u> of her psychological injuries within the meaning of the statute.</div>
  
 +
<div id="link57">
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w320g07n1621054vw23l46&state=CA Little v. WCAB]
 
[http://www.workcompcentral.com/members/index.php?fa=wiki_redirect&case_no=w320g07n1621054vw23l46&state=CA Little v. WCAB]
 +
</div>
  
Note: [Unpublished] Substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that the petitioner filed a deficient skeletal petition for reconsideration and that he failed to prove he required erectile dysfunction medication on an industrial basis.
+
<div id="explanation57" style="display:none">Note: [Unpublished] Substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that the petitioner filed a deficient skeletal petition for reconsideration and that he failed to prove he required erectile dysfunction medication on an industrial basis.</div>
  
 
</td>
 
</td>

Latest revision as of 09:11, 14 December 2009

California > Labor Codes

§ 3600 Chapter 3 - Conditions of Compensation

History:



(a) Liability for the compensation provided by this division, in lieu of any other liability whatsoever to any person except as otherwise specifically provided in Sections 3602, 3706, and 4558, shall, without regard to negligence, exist against an employer for any injury sustained by his or her employees arising out of and in the course of the employment and for the death of any employee if the injury proximately causes death, in those cases where the following conditions of compensation concur:

(1) Where, at the time of the injury, both the employer and the employee are subject to the compensation provisions of this division.

(2) Where, at the time of the injury, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his or her employment and is acting within the course of his or her employment.

(3) Where the injury is proximately caused by the employment, either with or without negligence.

(4) Where the injury is not caused by the intoxication, by alcohol or the unlawful use of a controlled substance, of the injured employee. As used in this paragraph, "controlled substance" shall have the same meaning as prescribed in Section 11007 of the Health and Safety Code.

(5) Where the injury is not intentionally self-inflicted.

(6) Where the employee has not willfully and deliberately caused his or her own death.

(7) Where the injury does not arise out of an altercation in which the injured employee is the initial physical aggressor.

(8) Where the injury is not caused by the commission of a felony, or a crime which is punishable as specified in subdivision (b) of Section 17 of the Penal Code, by the injured employee, for which he or she has been convicted.

(9) Where the injury does not arise out of voluntary participation in any off-duty recreational, social, or athletic activity not constituting part of the employee's work-related duties, except where these activities are a reasonable expectancy of, or are expressly or impliedly required by, the employment. The administrative director shall promulgate reasonable rules and regulations requiring employers to post and keep posted in a conspicuous place or places a notice advising employees of the provisions of this subdivision. Failure of the employer to post the notice shall not constitute an expression of intent to waive the provisions of this subdivision.

(10) Except for psychiatric injuries governed by subdivision (e) of Section 3208.3, where the claim for compensation is filed after notice of termination or layoff, including voluntary layoff, and the claim is for an injury occurring prior to the time of notice of termination or layoff, no compensation shall be paid unless the employee demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that one or more of the following conditions apply:

(A) The employer has notice of the injury, as provided under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5400), prior to the notice of termination or layoff.

(B) The employee's medical records, existing prior to the notice of termination or layoff, contain evidence of the injury.

(C) The date of injury, as specified in Section 5411, is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff, but prior to the effective date of the termination or layoff.

(D) The date of injury, as specified in Section 5412, is subsequent to the date of the notice of termination or layoff.

For purposes of this paragraph, an employee provided notice pursuant to Sections 44948.5, 44949, 44951, 44955, 72411, 87740, and 87743 of the Education Code shall be considered to have been provided a notice of termination or layoff only upon a district's final decision not to reemploy that person.

A notice of termination or layoff that is not followed within 60 days by that termination or layoff shall not be subject to the provisions of this paragraph, and this paragraph shall not apply until receipt of a later notice of termination or layoff. The issuance of frequent notices of termination or layoff to an employee shall be considered a bad faith personnel action and shall make this paragraph inapplicable to the employee.

(b) Where an employee, or his or her dependents, receives the compensation provided by this division and secures a judgment for, or settlement of, civil damages pursuant to those specific exemptions to the employee's exclusive remedy set forth in subdivision (b) of Section 3602 and Section 4558, the compensation paid under this division shall be credited against the judgment or settlement, and the employer shall be relieved from the obligation to pay further compensation to, or on behalf of, the employee or his or her dependents up to the net amount of the judgment or settlement received by the employee or his or her heirs, or that portion of the judgment as has been satisfied.

(c) For purposes of determining whether to grant or deny a workers' compensation claim, if an employee is injured or killed by a third party in the course of the employee's employment, no personal relationship or personal connection shall be deemed to exist between the employee and the third party based only on a determination that the third party injured or killed the employee solely because of the third party's personal beliefs relating to his or her perception of the employee's race, religious creed, color, national origin, age, gender, disability, sex, or sexual orientation.

  Relevant Case Law