Following the recent cyberattack on Change Healthcare, Availity, a national revenue cycle management and electronic data interchange clearinghouse vendor, has “terminated” its connections with Change Healthcare.

Catherine Montgomery

The attack on Change, which processes a reported 50% of U.S. health care claims, crippled billing, prescriptions and other services across vast swaths of the nation’s health care system.

In a message to trading partners, Availity also stated that after March 16, 2024, it will return Change bill submissions “for which Availity has no current alternative pathway for electronic submission.”

In other words, Availity is washing its hands of bills that would usually be sent to Change, described as “the largest electronic ‘clearinghouse’ in the business.” Below, we summarize how this termination impacts providers’ revenue.

DaisyBill e-bills remain unaffected by the attack, as our software connects directly to claims administrators or their specific workers’ comp clearinghouses, none of which include Change.

Return to sender

In a March 14 email, Availity announced that it would cut ties with Change as a result of the cyberattack — a momentous decision considering Change’s near-omnipresence in U.S. health care (the federal Department of Health and Human Services estimates that Change is “involved in one in every three patient records”).

This Availity announcement contains three points that potentially affect providers' revenue:

1. Starting March 16, Availity intends to return an unspecified number of e-bills to providers and their billing vendors. “After Saturday, March 16, 2024, Availity will be returning previously held claims, as well as any new claim submissions, for which Availity has no current alternative pathway for electronic submission.”
2. Availity acknowledges the Herculean administrative burden returning these bills places on trading partners and providers to determine how to submit the bills to payers. “[W]e encourage trading partners [i.e., providers’ billing vendors] to work with providers to determine next steps to continue claims processing, including identifying alternative submission methods, such as payer portals, fax, mail or paper drop off."
3. Availity acknowledges that payment owed to providers could be denied due to timely filing issues. "We recommend reaching out directly to applicable payers to inquire about enforcement of timely filing requirements. Availity is not responsible for any delays relating to claim submissions.”

The fact that e-bills passed through two clearinghouses — both Availity and Change’s systems — exemplifies how unnecessarily convoluted medical e-billing has become, even before the cyberattack.

Navigating the clearinghouse maze

Clearinghouses accept e-bills from providers and forward them to payers for processing. However, navigating the clearinghouse system requires expertise.

A reliable e-bill delivery system should send each bill to the (single) correct clearinghouse, not a redundant, daisy-chained series of clearinghouses cobbled together with duct tape and bubblegum.

Too many billing vendors and clearinghouses assert that e-bills are easily “rerouted” to multiple clearinghouses in their journey to the designated payer. But in reality, that’s precisely how e-bills and documents get lost.

The Change cyberattack is a wake-up call for billing vendors to establish the most direct, efficient electronic pathways for sending bills from the provider to the payer and to have contingencies in place for the unexpected.

That approach is how 92% of daisyBill e-bills reach the payer intact, with mainly automated processes to submit the rest via fax or email (or mail in less than 1% of cases) when necessary.

Catherine Montgomery is the co-founder and CEO of daisyBill, a provider of workers' comp end-to-end revenue cycle management software. This post appears with permission.