Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Sunday, April 11, 2021 -

Industry Insights

Duff: A Presentation on Workers' Compensation COVID Presumptions

  • State: California
  • -  404 views
  • -  0 shares

Back on Jan. 22, Professor John F. Burton and I presented at a webinar conducted by the Workers' Injury Law and Advocacy Group (WILG) and titled, "COVID as an Occupational Disease: How Do Various States Handle these Claims?"

Michael C. Duff

Michael C. Duff

In this report, published by WILG, the edited papers from the webinar have been published. Most of the report consists of Burton's substantial paper. I contributed  a shorter paper on the legal mechanics of how the presumptions operate in an evidentiary sense, which gave me an opportunity to write the delightful phrase, "bursting bubble presumption."

One important difference between the views of Burton and my own is that, while we each support the idea of causation presumptions, he would automatically limit presumptions to a small universe of first responders and narrowly defined (perhaps by CDC categories) "essential workers."

I, on the other hand, am much more desirous of a robust, transparent, democratic debate on just who qualifies as an essential worker. It is now very clear that COVID-19 has had a disparate impact on communities of color, and the elephant in the room is that limiting COVID causation presumptions to first responders may have the impact of privileging relatively high paid, white, male workers.

I do not say that such limitations are definitively wrong. I merely think the matter of eligibility should be transparently and robustly debated, and the premise thereby subjected to public scrutiny.

Burton and I reach some common ground (and perhaps compromise) by way of his very interesting proposal that presumptions could be triggered by reference to OSHA-cited workplaces: Causation presumptions could be applied to workplaces known to be violating OSHA COVID-related safety standards.

A mechanism of that type may be preferable to presumption structures that ex ante (even if unintentionally) operate to discriminate against low-wage workers who are predominantly of color and women. In some ways, it avoids the question of who is essential and targets coverage to where it is most needed.

The presentation may be seen here.

Michael C. Duff is associate dean for student programs and external relations and professor of law at the University of Wyoming College of Law. This entry is republished from the Workers' Compensation Law Professors blog, with permission.

No Comments

Log in to post a comment

Close


Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.

Featured Video

Upcoming Events

  • Apr 14, 2021

    NAIRO 2021 Symposium

    Each year, NAIRO and its member companies stage an annual Symposium discussing the latest developm …

  • Apr 17, 2021

    Featured Webinar: 2021 Annual

    Overview: This program offers expert instruction and advice on rating, while providing the student …

  • Apr 20-29, 2021

    The IAIABC Forum 2021

    About the IAIABC Forum 2021 The focus of The Forum is collaboration. At The Forum, the IAIABC's c …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral Workers' Compensation
News and Education
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333