Switch back to WCC classic look

WorkCompCentral – Workers' Compensation Education, Courses, News and Information

Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Friday, October 30, 2020 -

Industry Insights

Grinberg: Post-C&R Voucher Obligations

  • State: California
  • -  384 views
  • -  0 shares

I bring you the panel decision in the case of Juan Quinonez v. Bodega Latina Corporation. Therein, the parties had reached a compromise and release agreement, but apparently the C&R did not cover the issue of the Supplemental Job Displacement Benefit voucher, which the applicant sought after resolving the case via C&R.

Gregory Grinberg

Gregory Grinberg

The judge ultimately ruled that because the defendant failed to make an offer of regular, modified or alternative work within 60 days of receipt of the Physician's Return-to-Work & Voucher Report, a voucher was due. 

The defendant responded by arguing that the report issued after the C&R was approved and the applicant voluntarily resigned his employment. The judge ruled that a voucher was due and, in the face of the defendant’s reconsideration petition, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed that “applicant’s resignation notice relinquishing his rights to employment defendant does not absolve defendant from its obligation to provide applicant with [an] SJDB voucher.” 

So, the defendant owes the voucher? 

The WCAB panel here is telling us that the record can continue to be developed even after settlement of the case, isn’t it? After your C&R check has cleared, the applicant can continue to develop the record to support supplemental benefits, such as a voucher.

So what’s a good idea for handling these cases going forward? How do you make sure that your closed file doesn’t get reopened to have to provide a voucher?

Well, for one thing, your defense attorney should probably start including language in the C&R that addresses this issue. Another important thing to remember to get done as part of the file closure procedure is to contact any physicians with pending reports — agreed medical evaluator, qualified medical evaluator or primary treating physician — and cancel the request for services.

Just one more thing we need to keep an eye on as we wrap up our files.

Gregory Grinberg is managing partner of Gale, Sutow & Associates’ S.F. Bay South office and a certified specialist in workers’ compensation law. This post is reprinted with permission from Grinberg’s WCDefenseCA blog.

No Comments

Log in to post a comment

Close


Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.

Featured Video

Upcoming Events

  • Oct 26-30, 2020

    2020 Virtual Workers' Compensa

    Workers’ compensation professionals from across the state will have the opportunity to learn from …

  • Nov 3, 2020

    NCSI 2020 Webinar Series

    Since our in-person meeting has been canceled we have shifted to a webinar series that will includ …

  • Nov 5, 2020

    2020 Comp Laude® Gala Goes Vir

    WorkCompCentral's Comp Laude® Gala is going virtual! Join us for 4 different days of networking, e …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral Workers' Compensation
News and Education
4081 Mission Oaks Blvd
Camarillo, CA 93012
(805) 484-0333