Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Tuesday, May 07, 2024 -

Industry Insights

Grinberg: No Jurisdiction to Hear Constitutional Challenges to Section 4700

  • State: California
  • -  0 shares

I bring to your attention the matter of Wilson (deceased) v. Securitas Security Services USA, a writ-denied decision.

Gregory Grinberg

Gregory Grinberg

Applicant had sustained an admitted injury, and the ultimate award for permanent disability was 61%. Applicant died about a year and a half after the date of injury from non-industrial causes. Labor Code section 4700 says “Neither temporary nor permanent disability payments shall be made for any period of time subsequent to the death of the employee.”

Just think about that for a second. Assuming max earner status, a 2012 injury would pay $230 per week, and 61% permanent disability would result in $82,627.50. As applicant passed just a year and a half after his injury, and assuming at least some period of temporary disability, there may have been some $70,000 or so (roughly estimated) of unpaid PD.

Applicant’s heirs challenged Labor Code section 4700 on constitutional grounds, arguing that application of section 4700 constituted “unjust enrichment” for the insurer. Although fairly grim, this is an accurate statement. But, technically speaking, doesn’t the non-industrial death of any applicant relieve an insurer of future medical care obligations?

In that sense, though unfortunate, the non-industrial death of a claimant results in a limitation of exposure for the insurer.

On reconsideration, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the judge's application of section 4700. It further rejected the constitutional argument on the basis that, as an administrative law body, it lacks jurisdiction to make determinations about the constitutionality of a statute.

The Court of Appeal likewise denied review.

In this particular case, applicant had accepted an offer to return to work after his injury and died while still an employee. In such an instance the employer was in a position to immediately notify the insurer, and the defendant was able to move swiftly to terminate PD benefits.

Gregory Grinberg is workers' compensation defense attorney at the Law Office of Gregory Grinberg, based in the San Francisco Bay Area. This post is reprinted with permission from Grinberg's WCDefenseCA blog.

No Comments

Log in to post a comment

Close


Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.

Advertisements

Upcoming Events

  • May 5-8, 2024

    Risk World

    Amplify Your Impact There’s no limit to what you can achieve when you join the global risk managem …

  • May 13-15, 2024

    NCCI's Annual Insights Symposi

    Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …

  • May 13-14, 2024

    CSIA Announces the 2024 Annual

    The Board of Managers is excited to announce that the CSIA 2024 Annual Meeting and Educational Con …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333