Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Saturday, July 27, 2024 -

Industry Insights

Headrick: Clearing Up a Common Misconception

  • State: Tennessee
  • -  0 shares

Merriam-Webster defines misconception as “a wrong or mistaken idea.”

Judge Audrey Headrick

Judge Audrey Headrick

For years, I, like others, believed that Twinkies stay fresh forever. In fact, the shelf life of a Twinkie is only 25 days! To this day, that’s a common misconception.

Another common misconception is that parties need to file multiple petitions for benefit determination. Attorneys often announce during a hearing that they intend to file “another PBD.” Or a glance at TNComp shows that one or both sides filed multiple petitions. Sometimes, a party refiles the same petition.

Don’t worry. You’re not alone if you’re guilty of filing multiple petitions.

Long ago, the Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation encouraged filing multiple petitions either to amend a petition or to address a new issue. That process often resulted in multiple mediations ending in settlement, issuance of a dispute resolution statement or issuance of a dispute certification notice.

As Chief Judge Switzer recently posted in his blog article, “Beginning March 25, 2024, all mediations in cases pending before the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims will conclude with the issuance of a dispute certification notice.” Mediators will no longer issue dispute resolution statements.

This important change means that you no longer need to file multiple petitions unless a rule or statute requires you to do so. For example, filing a second petition is necessary in the following situations:

  • A petition for benefit determination for settlement approval only, using the original docket number, is required for any post-settlement issue that arises.
  • A petition for benefit determination, using the original docket number, is required to seek increased benefits.
  • A petition for benefit determination is required after either a voluntary dismissal or a dismissal without prejudice.
  • A petition for benefit determination is required when a party disputes the medical director’s decision on utilization review.

Otherwise, you may simply file a motion to amend the petition and/or to include new issues that arise.

So don’t file more than one petition unless it’s required that you do so. And throw out those old Twinkies.

Audrey Headrick is a judge in the Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims, Chattanooga. This entry is republished with permission from the court's blog.

No Comments

Log in to post a comment

Close


Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.

Advertisements

Upcoming Events

  • Jul 29 – Aug 2, 2024

    76th Annual SAWCA Convention

    SAVE THE DATE! 76th Annual SAWCA Convention July 29 – August 2, 2024 Hotel Effie Sandestin 1 Grand …

  • Aug 14-17, 2024

    CSIMS 2024 Annual Dual Track C

    California Society of Industrial Medicine and Surgery (CSIMS) is combining its two conferences, PI …

  • Sep 23-26, 2024

    IAIABC 110th Convention

    The IAIABC invites you to the IAIABC 110th Convention, "Passport to Solutions". The IAIABC Convent …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333