Switch back to WCC classic look

WorkCompCentral – Workers' Compensation Education, Courses, News and Information

Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Tuesday, August 20, 2019 -

Columns

Grinberg: Once Claim Accepted, Worker Must Transfer Care to MPN

  • State: California
  • -  223 views
  • -  0 shares

Often enough, we have an applicant attorney fighting tooth and nail, proverbially speaking, to keep out of a defendant’s medical provider network.

Gregory Grinberg

Gregory Grinberg

Sometimes it is for legitimate reasons, like when an applicant walks into an exam room and is asked to place the audio recording of the doctor giving a generic exam.  Sometimes it’s for less legitimate reasons, like “I got a guy who will put TD checks in your left pocket and some serious drugs in your right, but he’s not in the MPN.”

Sometimes, however, you have the case where the reason why an applicant is not treating in the MPN is because the claim was denied to begin with. So what do you do once the claim has been accepted?

Well, that was the fact pattern in the split panel decision of Kim v. Elite 4 Print Inc.  Therein, the facts are just as above. Applicant’s claim is denied, so the treatment is received from a non-MPN physician. Then the claim is accepted and applicant refuses to transfer care into defendant’s MPN.

The split panel sided with defendant on this one — a limited victory — but I will take what I can get.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board majority noted that the defendant sent the applicant, applicant’ counsel and the non-MPN doctor a letter pursuant to section 9767.9. However, an expedited hearing was set, with applicant advancing the theory that “based on its initial denial of applicant’s injury claim, is defendant … permanently barred from transferring applicant into its MPN.”

The majority noted that “section 4603.2(a)(2) does not preclude defendant from exercising medical control through its MPN after it accepted applicant’s claim of injury.” 

One commissioner dissented, however, reasoning that the record failed to adequately address the question of whether defendant denied or failed to provide care.

So there’s something to take cheer in, at least. And what better way to start the week than with some good news?

Gregory Grinberg is a workers' compensation defense attorney at the Law Office of Gregory Grinberg, based in the San Francisco Bay Area. This post is reprinted with permission from Grinberg's WCDefenseCA blog.

No Comments

Log in to post a comment

Close


Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.

Featured Video

Upcoming Events

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral Workers' Compensation
News and Education
4081 Mission Oaks Blvd
Camarillo, CA 93012
(805) 484-0333