In an article published in 2018, author Evan Barrett Smith addresses current issues surrounding the federal Black Lung Benefits Act. His focus is principally on legal developments since the year 2000.
Smith initiates his discussion with noting that, to everyone’s surprise, cases of black lung by coal miners are on the rise. At one point not long ago, he notes, some researchers believed that the diagnosis was one of the past. Yet, modern coal mining practices and inattention to safety standards restricting coal dust exposure, among other factors, have reversed the trend.
This phenomenon was one known to this writer, as workers’ compensation judges in Virginia (deputy commissioners) have reported the last few years a significant uptick in the number of workers’ compensation cases for the condition. It is also one that has been treated in a PBS documentary.
The author is generally pessimistic. Still, the good news is that, if fidelity is shown to dust exposure limits as established in 2014 by the Department of Labor, the black lung incidence rate should be lowered. This is so, however, only with compliance by industry.
The author, while pleased that the Affordable Care Act, via the “Byrd” Amendment, restored a presumption of causation for miners, is highly critical of the adjudication procedures in federal black lung cases. Indeed, he characterizes the delays in adjudication of cases as a “disgrace.”
Yet, he argues against the advocacy of some, who assert that black lung claimants should be able to compromise-settle their claims. He points out that the most important benefit under black lung is medical treatment, and that this is an item that should not lightly be thought appropriate for a release.
And because it is medical coverage that mine operators are seeking to avoid, they are not going to want to engage in partial settlements. (That, in fact, is the Pennsylvania experience, where settlement of all aspects of a claim is the default method of settlement, one usually mandated by carriers if a lump sum with release is to conclude a case.)
The Kentucky-based author, who has represented coal mining disease victims, has authored an articulate and superbly edited, educational review of the current landscape of Black Lung. His commentaries, notably, are also here and here.
David B. Torrey is adjunct professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and a workers’ compensation judge with the Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry. This entry is republished from the Workers' Compensation Law Professors blog, with permission.
Jul 17-19, 2019
We're Better Together There’s never a quiet moment in the hectic world of workers’ compensat …
Jul 21-24, 2019
AASCIF's 2019 Annual Conference is the conference designed with the unique needs of workers' compe …
Jul 24, 2019
This webinar emphasizes the benefits of working after injury, and the negative consequences of med …