Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Oct 24, 2025
This year, AWCP has the privilege of providing a dynamic group of presentations from all different …
Nov 7, 2025
Join Hawai'i’s premier workers’ comp event for expert insights, top-tier networking, and standout …
Mar 25, 2026
Career Services at California Lutheran University presents the Career & Intern Expo 2026, which wi …
2 Comments
Log in to post a comment
James Witkop Jun 24, 2020 a 7:40 am PDT
I haven't read the decision. My question is, if the Court of Appeal already resolved this issue in 1976, why do we need an En Banc decision 44 years later? Was the Bookout decision obscure or not being followed?
As someone who does not deal with SIBTF issues I am just curious.
Jonathan Ng Jun 24, 2020 a 11:49 am PDT
I am happy for the applicant bar but It seems that the Board has no more persuasive argument to use addition over CVC other than "this method of determining SIBTF’s liability ensures that applicant receives the full monetary value of the combined permanent disability (line 7,8 page 15.)" It is a policy argument , not a legal argument!