- Home
- Contact
- About Us
- Forgot Password
- Memberships
- Register
- Submit Press
- Privacy Policy
- TOS
- Disclaimers
- Marketing & Branding
- Corporate Sales
- Education
- RSS
© 2026 WorkCompCentral Workers Compensation Information
Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Apr 14-15, 2026
The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (FLOIR) invites you to attend its premier Insurance Sum …
Apr 20-22, 2026
The Forum brings the workers' compensation community together to collaborate, share insights and i …
Apr 22-24, 2026
Join us in Monterey for networking, learning and growth. Experience unparalleled opportunities f …
2 Comments
Log in to post a comment
John Don May 25, 2018 a 8:05 am PDT
If you add the cost of UR/IMR - we may conclude that all these reforms did little to curtail unnecessary costs while throwing the injured worker into a regulatory rabbit hole. Only a miracle rabbit can get out without being embittered by all the denials due to cost containment's. What's up doc?!
Paul Johnson May 25, 2018 a 10:05 am PDT
The RFA/UR/IMR process also creates unwarranted delays in receiving basic medical treatment which can create unnecessary (longer) periods of temporary disability. It's hard to explain to injured workers, who want treatment so they can get back to work, the reason(s) why treatment is delayed/denied.
Dr May 25, 2018 a 11:05 am PDT
Not a surprise -- we know from "Opioid Prescribing and Panic," workcompcentral, 2017-08-15, that many MPNs (Medical Provider Networks) denied injured workers access to alternative treatments for pain in the belief that the MPN would save money. Treating doctors were then obliged to rely on opioids and other medications when the alternative treatments were denied. That's what happens when "regulators" get the upper hand ("What happens when clinicians don't trust regulators," workcompcentral, 2015-12-02). -- Robert L. Weinmann, MD, Editor, The Weinmann Report, www.politicsofhealthcare.com