Switch back to WCC classic look

WorkCompCentral – Workers' Compensation Education, Courses, News and Information

Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Monday, July 23, 2018 -

News Articles

Appropriations Committee Plans Hearing on Breast Cancer Rating Bill

  • State: California
  • Topic: WEST
  • - Average time spent on item: 2 minutes
  • - Popular with: Other
The California Assembly Appropriations Committee will hold a hearing Thursday on a bill that would s…

Purchase this story for only $9.16!

Add to Cart

For access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.

One Comment

Log in to post a comment


Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.
Christopher Lear Jan 16, 2018 a 10:01 am PST

Hopefully, the California Assembly Appropriations Committee will specify that the impairment ratings for breast cancer are calculated by reviewing the consensus-derived estimates developed by medical specialists which reflect the severity of the medical condition and
the degree to which the impairment decreases an individual’s ability to perform common activities of daily living (ADL), excluding work. Hopefully they will note that the impairment ratings provided in the AMA Guides, 5th ed. were designed to reflect functional limitations
and not disability. They should recognize that the whole person impairment percentages listed in the Guides estimate the impact of the impairment on the individual’s overall ability to perform activities of daily living, excluding work, as listed in Table 1-2 of those Guides. Perhaps they will also recognize that their failure to do so will carve a single exception to those Guides for this one particular type of injury which would be unfair to every single injured worker who has their non-breast injury impairment calculated using this methodology. Perhaps they will also recognize that nobody is screaming foul simply because the AMA Guides specifically states that male mammary gland injury is, by definition, 0%. Those crying foul on behalf of women's breast injuries should have, in fairness, noted that this is unfair gender discrimination and since they are so obviously driven by their desire to eliminate gender discrimination it is odd that they would have missed that language in the AMA Guides.

Featured Video


Upcoming Events

  • Aug 6-9, 2018

    2018 DMEC Annual Conference

    Join us Aug. 6-9, 2018 in Austin, TX for the 2018 DMEC Annual Conference. You’ll connect with 70 …

  • Aug 10, 2018

    Dwight Johnson 2nd Annual Memo

    Join us for the Dwight Johnson 2nd Annual Memorial Golf Classic, each player receives a round of g …

  • Aug 11, 2018

    Live Seminar - Litigation Meth

    Discussion: Roadmap for Prepping Your Case for Trial - Cheat Sheets and Checklists for Every Hot …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links

WorkCompCentral Workers' Compensation
News and Education
4081 Mission Oaks Blvd
Camarillo, CA 93012
(805) 484-0333