- Home
- Contact
- About Us
- Forgot Password
- Memberships
- Register
- Submit Press
- Privacy Policy
- TOS
- Disclaimers
- Marketing & Branding
- Corporate Sales
- Education
- RSS
© 2026 WorkCompCentral Workers Compensation Information
Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Mar 3-4, 2026
Registration will open up in the coming months. We'll see you there! - Leading national workers' …
Mar 5-6, 2026
Register Now! 2026 conference topics: DWC Update AI with a Claims Focus Medical and Legal Ethics …
Mar 19-20, 2026
Register today! 2026 conference topics: DWC Update AI with a Claims Focus Medical and Legal Ethi …
2 Comments
Log in to post a comment
Frank Neuhauser Nov 15, 2018 a 7:11 am PST
How interesting that the key state player in work comp's steady improvement over the two Brown terms isn't mentioned by anyone. Christine Baker.
John Don Nov 15, 2018 a 8:11 am PST
Judges never decided medical care for injured workers. The Judges would look at two competing medical reports and decide which doctor made more sense. Presently, IMR does not decide whether medical care is good for the patient; IMR decides if the PTP got the recipe right - whether it matches the cookbook. Even if the doctor gets the recipe right - the IMR doctor can still shoot it down noting lack of evidence of functional improvement. Taking away or relieving the pain produced by injury is just not good enough.