Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Oct 10, 2025
Join Kids’ Chance of Illinois for A Night of Glitz & Giving at the Fountain Blue as we come togeth …
Nov 7, 2025
Join Hawai'i’s premier workers’ comp event for expert insights, top-tier networking, and standout …
2 Comments
Log in to post a comment
Steven Chandler Nov 25, 2019 a 8:11 am PST
Regarding Gurvey's comments about the doctor's best interests, he seems to forget and/or significantly discount the fact that MTUS, ACOEM, ODG and other guidelines are based on research and peer review - not one physician. Sure, I get the benefits of a physical exam to persuade an opinion but really, why can't this be better documented with a discussion as to why this patient doesn't fit into the norm?
As for Young, his reference to doctor-sanctioned care assumes no of us remember the time when the physician was presumed to be correct. This was a boon to applicant attorneys as costs skyrocketed, injuries enveloped other pre-existing, disability was through the roof, TTD was almost endless; businesses closed and left CA; and, of course, attorneys collected the highest in fees ever. Ya that worked out well. I'm curious why the writer chose not to include the opinion of a defense attorney in the story considering she used multiple applicant attorneys.
John Don Nov 25, 2019 a 9:11 am PST
Instead of 60 tablets - you only need 5 & there's nothing you can do to rebutt this?