Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Jan 15, 2026
Discover how psychosocial factors impact recovery outcomes in injured workers during WCRI’s 30-min …
Mar 3-4, 2026
Registration will open up in the coming months. We'll see you there! - Leading national workers' …
Mar 5-6, 2026
Register Now! 2026 conference topics: DWC Update AI with a Claims Focus Medical and Legal Ethics …
2 Comments
Log in to post a comment
Steven Chandler Nov 25, 2019 a 8:11 am PST
Regarding Gurvey's comments about the doctor's best interests, he seems to forget and/or significantly discount the fact that MTUS, ACOEM, ODG and other guidelines are based on research and peer review - not one physician. Sure, I get the benefits of a physical exam to persuade an opinion but really, why can't this be better documented with a discussion as to why this patient doesn't fit into the norm?
As for Young, his reference to doctor-sanctioned care assumes no of us remember the time when the physician was presumed to be correct. This was a boon to applicant attorneys as costs skyrocketed, injuries enveloped other pre-existing, disability was through the roof, TTD was almost endless; businesses closed and left CA; and, of course, attorneys collected the highest in fees ever. Ya that worked out well. I'm curious why the writer chose not to include the opinion of a defense attorney in the story considering she used multiple applicant attorneys.
John Don Nov 25, 2019 a 9:11 am PST
Instead of 60 tablets - you only need 5 & there's nothing you can do to rebutt this?