- Home
- Contact
- About Us
- Forgot Password
- Memberships
- Register
- Submit Press
- Privacy Policy
- TOS
- Disclaimers
- Marketing & Branding
- Corporate Sales
- Education
- RSS
© 2026 WorkCompCentral Workers Compensation Information
Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Jun 12, 2026
Get ready to “Be the Ball!” at AWCP’s 27th Annual Caddyshack Classic. Spend the day at Lincoln Hil …
Jun 23, 2026
Rafael Gonzalez, Esq. and John V. Cattie, Jr., will provide practical, real-world guidance to help …
Jul 7-9, 2026
Register Now! The CCWC Annual Conference: Legislative & Educational Forum creates opportunities f …
3 Comments
Log in to post a comment
Cliff Bernstein Nov 3, 2016 a 7:58 am PDT
This is no less deceiving then what the big banks recently got fined $5.8 billion dollars for
JAMES BADER Nov 3, 2016 a 7:58 am PDT
Only 6% of treatment requests are modified or denied ? Thats got to be the most unbelievable statistic I have ever heard.
Many claims administrators send ever single request for medical treatment to UR, which routinely deny the request for medical treatment, which is them rubber stamped by IMR. This is despite the fact it is an admitted case, and the applicant is treating in the MPN.
No matter how you present it, we all know its a system currently designed to routinely deny medical treatment, without any effective basis for an appeal. Sad days for anyone unfortunate enough to be injured at work.
John A. Don esq. Nov 3, 2016 a 7:58 am PDT
Should re-classify IMR as a treatment denial expense.
Anonymous Nov 3, 2016 a 7:58 am PDT
It's the ole Find the pea under the walnut shell game only this time there ain't no pea to look for. Reminds me the lyric in the song "Smiling Faces".... "Beware of the hand that pats you on the back".... Can you say "Schuck and Jive".