- Home
- Contact
- About Us
- Forgot Password
- Memberships
- Register
- Submit Press
- Privacy Policy
- TOS
- Disclaimers
- Marketing & Branding
- Corporate Sales
- Education
- RSS
© 2026 WorkCompCentral Workers Compensation Information
Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Apr 20-22, 2026
The Forum brings the workers' compensation community together to collaborate, share insights and i …
Apr 22-24, 2026
Join us in Monterey for networking, learning and growth. Experience unparalleled opportunities f …
Apr 23, 2026
Join us for the must-attend event for Texas workers’ compensation professionals! Connect with top …
3 Comments
Log in to post a comment
Cliff Bernstein Nov 3, 2016 a 7:58 am PDT
This is no less deceiving then what the big banks recently got fined $5.8 billion dollars for
JAMES BADER Nov 3, 2016 a 7:58 am PDT
Only 6% of treatment requests are modified or denied ? Thats got to be the most unbelievable statistic I have ever heard.
Many claims administrators send ever single request for medical treatment to UR, which routinely deny the request for medical treatment, which is them rubber stamped by IMR. This is despite the fact it is an admitted case, and the applicant is treating in the MPN.
No matter how you present it, we all know its a system currently designed to routinely deny medical treatment, without any effective basis for an appeal. Sad days for anyone unfortunate enough to be injured at work.
John A. Don esq. Nov 3, 2016 a 7:58 am PDT
Should re-classify IMR as a treatment denial expense.
Anonymous Nov 3, 2016 a 7:58 am PDT
It's the ole Find the pea under the walnut shell game only this time there ain't no pea to look for. Reminds me the lyric in the song "Smiling Faces".... "Beware of the hand that pats you on the back".... Can you say "Schuck and Jive".