Close
Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.
Bruce Wade
Aug 2, 2019 a 12:08 pm PDT
It's so cute that Mr. Neuhauser thinks the basis for safety officer presumptions is supposed to be scientific. Of course, the real basis is political. Safety officers have powerful unions. No politician benefits by disputing what safety officers demand from them. Safety officers make very sympathetic and dynamic constituencies. They don't need facts or scientific evidence to support their demands for special consideration from workers' compensation laws and the WCAB.
One Comment
Log in to post a comment
Bruce Wade Aug 2, 2019 a 12:08 pm PDT
It's so cute that Mr. Neuhauser thinks the basis for safety officer presumptions is supposed to be scientific. Of course, the real basis is political. Safety officers have powerful unions. No politician benefits by disputing what safety officers demand from them. Safety officers make very sympathetic and dynamic constituencies. They don't need facts or scientific evidence to support their demands for special consideration from workers' compensation laws and the WCAB.