Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Apr 11-12, 2023
This annual event is all about championing the cause to improve workers’ compensation, tackling so …
Apr 12-16, 2023
Are you a claimant attorney trying to tread the treacherous waters of representing your clients un …
Apr 21, 2023
Join us as we set sail out of Newport Beach, California on April 20th, 2023 on board the Endless D …
2 Comments
Log in to post a comment
Garry Crosby Nov 3, 2016 a 2:58 pm PDT
interesting to note that all non medicals deciding medical treatment. and talk abt vested interest!!!!! ins company exec who earn in millions directing medical treatment which is right now below medical standards in the country.and discussing ways to deny treatments and payments to providers. Work comp care is different from reg medicine as the LAW dictates all issues and more work is needed to deliver the same level of care to an IW.
Glenn Hakanson MD Nov 3, 2016 a 2:58 pm PDT
1) IMHO the more they emphasize, "controlling how they (doctors) treat their patients," the more doctors leave the WC system.
2) In California, post SB 863, "collaborating and communicating" with other doctors is discouraged since consulting and reviewing records is NOT paid for.
3) It is also difficult to get reimbursed for telemedicine with patients, let alone other doctors in California.