Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
Jul 29 – Aug 2, 2024
SAVE THE DATE! 76th Annual SAWCA Convention July 29 August 2, 2024 Hotel Effie Sandestin 1 Grand …
Aug 14-17, 2024
California Society of Industrial Medicine and Surgery (CSIMS) is combining its two conferences, PI …
Sep 23-26, 2024
The IAIABC invites you to the IAIABC 110th Convention, "Passport to Solutions". The IAIABC Convent …
One Comment
Log in to post a comment
Steven Chandler Jun 21, 2018 a 8:06 am PDT
While it's good to see there is some action by the Feds to resolve the MSA process, I believe this proposed process will serve principally to increase settlement costs substantially. Why? You lose the significant savings realized by annuitizing the MSA value. Here, Portman and Nelson's bill would have "a direct, one-time payment to Medicare". As an example, do you think Medicare will joyfully accept seed money now with much smaller payments annually until such time the claimant dies? I think not. The payor must pay all of it now (from the proceeds of the inflated settlement) without respect to its net present value or the value with interest compounding over time to meet its' obligations. Sorry, I can't chew this. I often save significant sums of money through structured settlements. If you can add a provision into your bill that discounts the lifetime cost similar to or greater than what an annuity can, then I'm ready to listen. If this passes as it is, the process may be a bit smoother (albeit the appeals process) but payors will be asked to dump money into Social Security with a blind trust that it'll be spent and invested wisely.