Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Monday, September 25, 2023 -

News Articles

Legislation Seeks to Head off DWC Effort to Remove Neuropsychology QMEs

  • State: California
  • Topic: Top
  • - Popular with: Legal
Two California medical organizations co-sponsored a bill introduced last week that aims to remo…

Purchase this story for only $7.99!

Add to Cart

For access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.

4 Comments (2 Replies)

Log in to post a comment


Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.
Apr 27, 2015 a 11:04 am PDT

This comment is private

Beth Harville Nov 3, 2016 a 2:58 pm PDT

If they want to get rid of a specialty between psychology and neuropsychology, we would be much better off if they drop psychology. Neuropsych has a specific and needed focus that cannot usually be obtained using another specialty, unlike psychology which is effectively overlapped by psychiatry.

Marjorie Cohn, Ph.D. QME Nov 3, 2016 a 2:58 pm PDT

I could see your point at first glance but psychiatrists and psychologists have, with a few exceptions, different types of training. Being MDs, psychiatrists are better versed in psychopharmacology and medication management and in a better position to opine on medication issues. Psychologists, on the other hand, are much better versed in psychological testing. In looking at psychiatric residency curricula of several institutions, I was unable to find any coursework on psych testing. Many Ph.D. programs have multiple semesters of testing and assessment. Plus these days as you know, many psychiatrists focus on medication whereas psychologists are engaged in the therapeutic process itself. I agree with you that neuropsychology is needed.

Mullen & Filippi San Jos Nov 3, 2016 a 2:58 pm PDT

So, let me get this straight: they propose eliminating neuropsychology as a QME specialty but do not address acupuncture as a QME specialty?
Lest we forget, acupuncturists are not permitted, under Labor Code Section 3209.3 (e), from determining disability.
So since QMEs are not to determine specific future medical treatment, nor can the acupuncturist address disability, what is the reason they're allowed to do QME evaluations, other than as money making opportunities? Douglas Adams surely would have put them on the same spaceship as the telephone sanitizers, advertising executives, hairstylists, and, alas, lawyers....

Cheryl Chicaul-Sanchez Nov 3, 2016 a 2:58 pm PDT

Somebody once said people who appreciate good public policy and fine sausage should never watch either one being made.

Anonymous Nov 21, 2016 a 6:49 pm PST

I would like to know where to send letters to support AB1542. Is the Assembly Insurance Committee voting on this next?


Upcoming Events

  • Sep 27, 2023

    Evaluating an Ever-Changing Ph

    Payers face numerous challenges in managing pharmacy care in workers compensation. Opioids, emerg …

  • Sep 27-29, 2023

    2023 Governor's Conference

    Conference Topics: The Future of Occupational Health Work Comp Court Case Review Unsung Hereos of …

  • Oct 7-12, 2023

    WILG Annual Conference

    Saturday, October 7th Advocates of WILG and Firm Sponsor Appreciation Event TBD (Invitation only …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links

c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333