Close
Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.
Dr
May 28, 2022 a 11:55 am PDT
Does Razo agree that Utilization Review physicians should be licensed to practice medicine in California, the same as treating physicians, or does he prefer to keep them exempt? I refer to "How to Practice Medicine without a license, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 8/29/08.
Does Razo agree that Duty of Care as a professional ethic should be as equally applied to Utilization Review physicians as it is to treating physicians? I refer to "Weinmann: UR physicians do not owe injured workers 'Duty of Care, '" WORKCOMPCENTRAL, 18 Sept 2018.
-- Robert L. Weinmann, MD, Pres, California Neurology Society, chair, Legislation Cmte, formerly president, L 206, AFSCME (UAPD)
One Comment
Log in to post a comment
Dr May 28, 2022 a 11:55 am PDT
Does Razo agree that Utilization Review physicians should be licensed to practice medicine in California, the same as treating physicians, or does he prefer to keep them exempt? I refer to "How to Practice Medicine without a license, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, 8/29/08.
Does Razo agree that Duty of Care as a professional ethic should be as equally applied to Utilization Review physicians as it is to treating physicians? I refer to "Weinmann: UR physicians do not owe injured workers 'Duty of Care, '" WORKCOMPCENTRAL, 18 Sept 2018.
-- Robert L. Weinmann, MD, Pres, California Neurology Society, chair, Legislation Cmte, formerly president, L 206, AFSCME (UAPD)