Purchase this story for only $7.99!
Add to CartFor access to all our articles, check out our subscription options.
May 5-8, 2024
Amplify Your Impact Theres no limit to what you can achieve when you join the global risk managem …
May 13-15, 2024
Join us May 1315, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industrys premier e …
May 13-14, 2024
The Board of Managers is excited to announce that the CSIA 2024 Annual Meeting and Educational Con …
One Comment
Log in to post a comment
George Corson Jan 18, 2020 a 4:01 pm PST
This whole thing just seems awkward.
1. Dynamex for all Labor issues, but Borello for WC.
2. Dynamex for all Labor issues, and Dynamex for WC if there are more than 100 Employees, but Borello for Employers with under 100.
3. Dynamex for Labor and WC if there are more than 100 Employees, but Borello for both if there are less than 100.
I agree that Dynamex has Logistical issues for a number of occupations who want to be Independent Contractors. I also see that different standards based upon size rather than occupation will not solve most of them. If WC classification/insurance is the true issue, just rule that a Worker who does not have a business license/business TIN at time of hire is presumed an Employee. Those are objective standards that can be controlled by everyone. It encourages business tracking, freedom of choice, and financial paper trails.
Want to be an Independent Journalist? Get a Business License/TIN and call yourself “Pulitzer Bob’s Stories for Hire.” Give that to the Newspaper and you get a 1099. Otherwise, the LA Times owns you as an Employee, and you get a W-2. The City can track the Business License and the FTB can track the money.
Is it perfect? Probably not, because you can parse any legal standard. Is it cleaner and easier to follow? I truly think it is.
Keith Pusavat Jan 18, 2020 a 8:01 pm PST
"Those are objective standards that can be controlled by everyone." Amen. It's pointless to use a 10-factor test as the standard, because there's so much subjectivity.