12/17/2020
nevertheless can be deemed the initial physical aggressor is of no consequence since the indisputable fact remains that the two participants in the altercation were present on the construction premises became involved in a heated controversy and proceeded to act all in connection with their employment. In
Category: Cases
11/01/2021
employment information that was unsubstantiated. Dr. Bokarius
opined applicant meets criteria for a psychiatric injury and as to causation states
I find the examinees psychiatric injury meets the 51 predominant cause
threshold for occurring in the course of and being the consequence of events of
Category: Panel
01/01/2022
Decision of the Arbitrator. The Commission finds Petitioner
proved her right wrist condition developed as consequence of her repetitive work activities. The
Commission remands this case to the Arbitrator for further proceedings for a determination of a
further amount of temporary total compensation or of
Category: Panel
09/01/2021
aggravated or accelerated as
a consequence of her February 2013 fall.
Dr. Zelby testified that Petitioners persistent and the severity of her complaints were inconsistent with
the objective medical findings and were also inconsistent with the natural history of her objective medical
condition. Dr. Zelby
Category: Panel
04/01/2022
returned to its baseline. The Commission therefore finds that the Petitioner established causal
connection between his low back condition and the work-related accident.
The Commission is also not persuaded by Respondents argument relative to the left knee.
Every natural consequence that flows from a
Category: Panel
08/01/2023
the
record and applicable case law I would have found that Petitioners claim is compensable as the
Commission has jurisdiction to decide the instant claim under the Illinois Workers Compensation
Act as the last act of hire occurred in Illinois on May 9 2018 when the union referred Petitioner
Category: Panel
07/01/2021
ILLINOIS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION
DECISION SIGNATURE PAGE
Case Number
17WC035761
Case Name
MILLER PHILLIP v.
CEDAR RAPIDS S
Category: Panel
03/01/2020
compensable accident under
a repetitive trauma theory of recovery. See Williams v. Industrial Commission 244 Ill. App. 3d
204 211614 N.E.2d 177 1993 citing Perkins Product Co. v. Industrial Commission 379 Ill.
115 120 1942 "the claimant's injury 'was directly connected with the manner and method in
Category: Panel
09/01/2018
need for medical
treatment and claimed periods ofTTD were a consequence of her work accident. On that
issue Petitioner had the burden of proof and the Arbitrator has concluded that she failed
to meet that burden. In so concluding the Arbitrator relies upon significant gaps in
treatment followed by new
Category: Panel
09/01/2015
failed to prove a compensable accident within the meaning of the Act. Benefits requested
pursuant to Section 8 are therefore denied.
RULES REGARDING APPEALs Unless a party files a Petition for Review within 30 days after receipt of this decision
and perfects a review in accordance with the Act and Rules
Category: Panel