10/01/2010
history of working as a data entry clerk from 1988 untill1906 when she was suspended. She stated that she has never returned to work. The
doctor noted that petitioner's problems are a direct consequence of her job. On 21808 petitioner underwent a right ring finger proximal interphalangeal joint
Category: Panel
08/01/2023
the
record and applicable case law I would have found that Petitioners claim is compensable as the
Commission has jurisdiction to decide the instant claim under the Illinois Workers Compensation
Act as the last act of hire occurred in Illinois on May 9 2018 when the union referred Petitioner
Category: Panel
07/01/2021
ILLINOIS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION
DECISION SIGNATURE PAGE
Case Number
17WC035761
Case Name
MILLER PHILLIP v.
CEDAR RAPIDS S
Category: Panel
03/01/2020
compensable accident under
a repetitive trauma theory of recovery. See Williams v. Industrial Commission 244 Ill. App. 3d
204 211614 N.E.2d 177 1993 citing Perkins Product Co. v. Industrial Commission 379 Ill.
115 120 1942 "the claimant's injury 'was directly connected with the manner and method in
Category: Panel
12/01/2021
appointments.
Injuries resulting from a risk distinctly associated with employment i.e. an employment-
related risk are compensable under the Act. Steak n Shake v. Illinois Workers Compensation
Commission 2016 IL App 3d 150500WC 35 67 N.E.3d 571. Risks are distinctly associated
with
Category: Panel
09/01/2018
need for medical
treatment and claimed periods ofTTD were a consequence of her work accident. On that
issue Petitioner had the burden of proof and the Arbitrator has concluded that she failed
to meet that burden. In so concluding the Arbitrator relies upon significant gaps in
treatment followed by new
Category: Panel
05/01/2022
including certain deposit requirements in order to provide protection
to the workers of the state in the event the insurers issuing workers compensation insurance to
employers fail to pay compensable workers compensation claims when due. Ins. Code 11691.
Every insurer is required to be a
Category: Panel
03/01/2015
consequence othe work accident oMarch 26. 2012. I have recommended that the patient obtain an opinion
regarding his foot and ankle from a premier orthopedic foot ankle specialist such as Dr. Armen Kelikian at
8
Cuauhtemoc Betancourt v. Baldwin Oxy-Drv Corp.' 12 we
cc 0 1 7 3
1284115 I w
Northwestern
Category: Panel
09/01/2015
failed to prove a compensable accident within the meaning of the Act. Benefits requested
pursuant to Section 8 are therefore denied.
RULES REGARDING APPEALs Unless a party files a Petition for Review within 30 days after receipt of this decision
and perfects a review in accordance with the Act and Rules
Category: Panel
04/01/2011
ensuing injury not necessarily the causative factor. Vogel v. Industrial Commission 354 IlI.App.3d 780 786 821 N.E.2d 807 290 Ill. Dec. 495 2d Dist. 2005. Every natural consequence that flows from an injury that arose out of and in the course of employment is compensable unless caused by an
Category: Panel