Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Thursday, March 28, 2024 -

Industry Insights

Grinberg: WCAB Rejects Bills From Depo Prep Interpreter

  • State: California
  • - Popular with: Legal
  • -  0 shares

I'm going to give you some free advice: Watch "The Office" (American version). If you have watched it, watch it again. It is awesome.

Gregory Grinberg

Gregory Grinberg

In one scene, one of the characters, Jim, invites his co-workers to his home for a party, and he invites another character, Dwight, in particular, because Jim’s roommate did not believe Dwight existed, based on the stories Jim related to him. 

So, too, with workers’ compensation. When I relate the battles we fight to those blessedly ignorant of our daily struggles, I am often accused of making things up. 

“Yes, you can have a cumulative trauma that magically appears right before you retire.”

“Yes, you can be permanently, totally disabled and then magically recover five years after you got hurt, especially once the big checks clear.”

“Yes, sometimes we pay more for utilization review than the cost of the treatment we are reviewing.”

So, with all that in mind, let’s take a look at Li v. Kaiser Permanente, a recent panel decision. The case had to do with an interpreter seeking costs for deposition preparation of the injured worker.  The defendant noticed applicant’s deposition and advised that it would provide interpreting services for both the preparation and deposition. The judge ultimately denied the interpreter’s petition for costs related to the deposition prep.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board panel denied reconsideration. Citing Labor Code Section 5811(b)(1) and Contreras v. Gibson Farms, the WCAB held that it is the party producing the witness that should provide the interpreter, and since the defendant noticed the deposition, the defendant should provide the interpreter.  

The reasoning highlighted that the burden was, of course, on the interpreter: “Cost petitioner has failed to provide any evidence why it was reasonable and necessary to use an interpreter chosen by applicant instead of defendant. There is no evidence that defendant was unable or unwilling to provide an interpreter for deposition preparation.  There are no objections in the record, if any were in fact made, by applicant to the use of an interpreter provided by defendant.”

So, what can we take from the Li case? First off, in order for an applicant attorney to get an interpreter paid by the defense for deposition preparation, the applicant attorney needs to make some sort of timely objection when the defense provides notice that it intends to select the interpreter. Second, this is a friendly reminder that cost petitioners, like interpreters, have the burden of showing that their services were actually rendered and actually necessary.

Finally, we should all be reminded that not all of our efforts will be to turn away million-dollar exposure cases or reducing permanent total disability claims to take-nothings.  Often enough, our time is spent with smaller matters to make sure those matters don’t become big ones.

Gregory Grinberg is managing partner of Gale, Sutow & Associates’ S.F. Bay South office and a certified specialist in workers’ compensation law. This post is reprinted with permission from Grinberg’s WCDefenseCA blog.

No Comments

Log in to post a comment

Close


Do not post libelous remarks. You are solely responsible for the postings you input. By posting here you agree to hold harmless and indemnify WorkCompCentral for any damages and actions your post may cause.

Advertisements

Upcoming Events

  • May 13-15, 2024

    NCCI's Annual Insights Symposi

    Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …

  • Jul 29 – Aug 2, 2024

    76th Annual SAWCA Convention

    SAVE THE DATE! 76th Annual SAWCA Convention July 29 – August 2, 2024 Hotel Effie Sandestin 1 Grand …

  • Aug 14-17, 2024

    CSIMS 2024 Annual Dual Track C

    California Society of Industrial Medicine and Surgery (CSIMS) is combining its two conferences, PI …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333