I've written a short paper in advance of the 2020 Workers' Compensation Midwinter Conference panel in which I'll be participating on March 28 in New Orleans. The panel is titled, "Workers' Compensation and the 'Gig' Economy: Challenges Flowing From Temporary Work."

Michael C. Duff

As usual, I will play the role of "unreasonable angry guy" raving only barely controllably at "mean stuff." Blogmate Judge David Torrey will provide needed stability, as will Pittsburgh attorney Justin Beck.

On the panel I'll be discussing my short paper, as titled above, addressing the enactment of "marketplace platform" laws, which have arisen as a remarkable feature of the "gig" economy in recent years.

A marketplace platform law decides the question of whether an individual worker is an independent contractor or an employee — an ongoing controversy in all employment law, including workers’ compensation law — by emphasizing factors other than those normally considered in traditional legal analyses.

As of this writing, seven states appear to have enacted marketplace platform laws.

In short, marketplace platform laws — developed substantially and lobbied aggressively by the company Handy Inc. — make it much easier to classify a worker as an "independent contractor" rather than an "employee." Essentially, as the paper shows by analyzing one such law, if a company uses "online enhancements" in the operation of its business, it may qualify as a "marketplace contractor" rather than an "employer," whatever the degree of control of working conditions it may exercise de facto in the workplace.

The paper shows how, in the case of workers' compensation law, this de-emphasis of the control factor in the assignment of responsibility for workplace injury flies in the face of original workers' compensation theory. The development is also at complete odds with the ABC employee test, which not only emphasizes the control factor but places the burden of proof on employers to show an absence of control.

However one may come down on the employee status issue, there seems no denying that, in light of California's substantial adoption of the ABC test in broad swaths of its employment law, what rights a worker has to legal protection is increasingly dependent on the worker's state of residence or employment.

The full paper is here.

Michael C. Duff is associate dean for student programs and external relations, and is professor of law, at the University of Wyoming College of Law. This entry is republished from the Workers' Compensation Law Professors blog, with permission.