Industry Insights
July 15, 2021
Grinberg: AB 334 and Skin Cancer Presumption
- State: California
- - 0 shares
You know what? Sometimes, I'm in a situation where I just have to be the bad guy.
Well, perhaps this is one of those situations because one of the pieces of legislation snaking its way through Sacramento is Assembly Bill 334, which will expand the list of presumptions for certain state and local government employees, namely active lifeguards and Department of Fish and Game and Department of Parks and Recreation employees.
Gregory Grinberg
I, the bad guy, disapprove of the ever-growing list of presumptions that almost always favor the applicant and rarely benefit the employer.
AB 334 would presume that skin cancer “developing or manifesting” during the employment of active lifeguards and game wardens is industrial. It includes the usual presumption language already offered to various other peace officers, including that “skin cancer so developing or manifesting itself in these cases shall not be attributed to any disease existing prior to that development or manifestation.”
All of these presumption laws have a simple function: the shift the cost of these maladies, such as skin cancer in the case of AB 334, from the individual to the taxpayer.
Without the presumption, the lifeguards and game wardens could still get workers’ compensation for these conditions, but they would have to carry their burden of proving causation. So, even if the skin cancer develops for nonindustrial reasons, that cost will be borne by the taxpayers, should AB 334 become law.
Just one more thing to be aware of as the legislative landscape gets progressively bumpier for employers, public and private alike.
Gregory Grinberg is managing partner of Gale, Sutow & Associates’ S.F. Bay South office and a certified specialist in workers’ compensation law. This post is reprinted with permission from Grinberg’s WCDefenseCA blog.
Advertisements
Columns
- Barthel: The AI Case Every Adjuster Should Know 09/28/26
- Barthel: Why Unchecked AI Inflates Litigation Budgets 09/25/26
- Paduda: Is California the Canary in the Coal Mine? 09/24/26
- Barthel: How AI Can Turn a Defensible Claim Into an Indefensible Nightmare, Part 1 09/23/26
- Bair: When Professional Athletes Get Hurt 09/14/26
- CAAA: DIR Under Fire for Misuse of Workers' Comp Funds 09/10/26
- Stewart: Not Again! Another Defective PR-2 Report 08/31/26
- Barthel: What Is a Medicare Set-Aside? 08/28/26
- Goldstein: 'Workers' Compensation' Pharmacies Can Increase Drug Costs 100-Fold 08/21/26
- CAAA: Comp Fraud Doesn't Begin and End With Injured Workers 08/18/26
- Montgomery: WCB Provider Webinar Series Returns Tuesday 08/14/26
- Montgomery: Where's the Data in CWCI's Cumulative Trauma Report? 08/12/26
- Feinberg and Rassp: Vigil and the CVC: A Practical Framework for QMEs 08/07/26
- Montgomery: Three Reasons Why the MPN System Is a Failure 07/29/26
- Montgomery: Presenting Hard Truths to the CHSWC 07/23/26
- Barthel: The 'Please Don't Try This at Work' Exception 07/20/26
- Barthel: Does Accuracy of WCJ Credibility Assessments Justify Using Them as Lie Detectors? 07/15/26
- Zachry: Every Delay in Comp Hurts Workers, Increases Costs 07/02/26
- Paduda: The Heat Dome? It's Gonna Be Brutal. 07/01/26
- Wroten: Actuarial Study Finds Self-Insured Employers Save an Average of 19% 06/29/26
Now Trending
- Workers' Compensation News
-
Calif. WCIRB Sets
Up Fraud…
Posted on Sep 25, 2026
-
Texas Worker Fails
to Prove Intentional Injuy
Exception to…
Posted on Sep 23, 2026
-
Colo. Court:
Compensability Determination or
Admission Required to Reopen Claim…
Posted on Sep 21, 2026
-
Ntl. Summit
Expands Workers' Compensation
Coverage…
Posted on Sep 21, 2026
-
N.J. Worker Can't
Pursue Damages for Injuries as Part
of Discrimination…
Posted on Sep 24, 2026
-
Fla. Firefighter's
Arrhythmia-Based Condition
Qualifies as Heart…
Posted on Sep 25, 2026
-
Texas Court: Judge
Should Have Compelled Arbitration
of Civil Claims Arising From…
Posted on Sep 22, 2026
-
Nev. Supreme Court
Upholds Dismissal of Worker's
Vicarious Liability Legal…
Posted on Sep 22, 2026
-
Ga. EverPeak
Expands Direct-to-Consumer Comp…
Posted on Sep 22, 2026
-
N.Y. Worker's
Malpractice Claims Against Former
Attorneys Get…
Posted on Sep 21, 2026
Jobs
- Defense Attorney - Remote Work Available
- Workers' Compensation Defense Attorney
- DEFENSE ATTORNEY - WORKERS COMP
SALARY RANGE $200-240K per year - Workers' Compensation Defense Associate Attorney
- JC-532205 – Workers’ Compensation Judge
- Staff / Senior Staff Attorney, Workers' Compensation
- attorney Workers' Compensation Jobs
Press Releases
Upcoming Events
Sep 28-30, 2026
Building Bridges IAIABC 112th
The IAIABC Convention addresses the current policy, regulatory, and administrative challenges and …
Oct 9, 2026
Hirma Webinar
Fraud can involve claimants, providers, employers, or multiple parties working together. Understan …
Oct 16, 2026
KCOCA Inaugural Golf Tournamen
On October 16, 2026, we will be taking over the fairways of the Rancho Bernardo Inn in Rancho Bern …
Social Media Links
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Greenwich, CT 06836
No Comments
Log in to post a comment