Call or email us anytime
(805) 484-0333
Search Guide
Today is Saturday, April 27, 2024 -

SEARCH RESULTS

2375 Results

Barrero, Roberto

05/01/2013
that applicant sustained an injury in the form of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy CIDP as a compensable consequence of the industrial injury applicant sustained on March 31 1975 to his back psyche and in the form of a urologic condition. The WCJ also found that applicant is

Category: Panel

Re: New Injury vs Compensable Consequence (California)

07/31/2009
I agree. I think this would be a new injury. After all it happened at work. The hand was not really injured BECAUSE OF the shoulderelbow injury.

Category: Forums

Re: New Injury vs Compensable Consequence (California)

07/31/2009
There is case law in the VR area that awards joint and several liability in situations that are analogous to the described case. It appears to me th

Category: Forums

New v. Old Schedule (California)

06/10/2010
2001 ortho case stipulated in 05 properly based upon old schedule. Then in 2006 New and Further filed and includs new body parts psyche and internal as compensable consequence. I assume new body parts are old schedule as well

Category: Forums

heart attack from weight gain = compensable consequence ? (Ca

05/17/2011
applicant has industrial ortho injuries settles by Stips then files pet. to reopen for heart attack. Internal med doc says heart problems in part re

Category: Forums

Re: heart attack from weight gain = compensable consequence ? (Ca

05/18/2011
Read "Granado v WCAB 1968 33 CCC 647 Supreme Court En Banc." It's not directly on point with your fact pattern but it's still good law an

Category: Forums

Re: Injury in Treatment More than 5 Years from DOI (California)

08/31/2012
No. It's still the same injury a compensable consequence. But a bad surgery is potentially malpractice which IMHO is your remedy. Send your client to a med-mal specialist in P.I.

Category: Forums

Re: Settled Specific to ReOpen as CT?? (California)

04/04/2012
compensable consequence of the specific injury. That if the parties want him to address the other body parts as to whether or not the CT supports the mechanism of injury they should provide an Application for the CT. That he will defer discussion as to the other body parts if they are not compensable

Category: Forums

GoslinJack

03/01/2009
hypertension and May 23 2007 for his heart trouble. Finally defendant contended that the 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 01 11f 12 evidence does not justify the finding that applicant's hypertension is a compensable consequence of his lung cancer. Applicant filed an answer. Based on our review of the record and

Category: Panel

In re Compensation of Pepperling

12/17/2020
cause of the need for treatment. SAIF did not dispute that the medical evidence established that the industrial accident was a material contributing cause of the need for treatment of the MRSA but contended that the infection was a consequence of the compensable injury rather than the industrial

Category: Cases

Start | < Previous | 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 | Next > | End

Advertisements

Upcoming Events

  • May 5-8, 2024

    Risk World

    Amplify Your Impact There’s no limit to what you can achieve when you join the global risk managem …

  • May 13-15, 2024

    NCCI's Annual Insights Symposi

    Join us May 13–15, 2024, for NCCI's Annual Insights Symposium (AIS) 2024, the industry’s premier e …

  • May 13-14, 2024

    CSIA Announces the 2024 Annual

    The Board of Managers is excited to announce that the CSIA 2024 Annual Meeting and Educational Con …

Workers' Compensation Events

Social Media Links


WorkCompCentral
c/o Business Insurance Holdings, Inc.
PO Box 1010
Greenwich, CT 06836
(805) 484-0333